Brunner v. New York State Higher Educ. Services Corp.

Decision Date14 October 1987
Docket NumberNo. 41,D,41
Citation831 F.2d 395
Parties42 Ed. Law Rep. 535, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,025 Marie BRUNNER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SERVICES CORP., Appellee. ocket 87-5013.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Marie Brunner, pro se.

Frederick J. Schreyer, Albany, N.Y., for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, OAKES and KEARSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Marie Brunner, pro se, appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles S. Haight, Judge, which held that it was error for the bankruptcy court to discharge her student loans based on "undue hardship,"46 B.R. 752(Bankr.D.C.N.Y.1985).We affirm.

While this court is obliged to accept the bankruptcy court's undisturbed findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, it is not required to accept its conclusions as to the legal effect of those findings.Montco, Inc. v. Glatzer(In re Emergency Beacon Corp.), 665 F.2d 36, 40(2d Cir.1981)(citingQueens Blvd. Wine & Liquor Corp. v. Blum, 503 F.2d 202(2d Cir.1974);R.Bankr.P. 810(current version, seeR.Bankr.P. 8013);Bank of Pa. v. Adlman, 541 F.2d 999, 1005(2d Cir.1976)).Whether not discharging Brunner's student loans would impose on her "undue hardship" under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523(a)(8)(B) requires a conclusion regarding the legal effect of the bankruptcy court's findings as to her circumstances.Therefore, the bankruptcy court's conclusion of "undue hardship" properly was reviewed by the district court.

As noted by the district court, there is very little appellate authority on the definition of "undue hardship" in the context of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523(a)(8)(B).Based on legislative history and the decisions of other district and bankruptcy courts, the district court adopted a standard for "undue hardship" requiring a three-part showing: (1) that the debtor cannot maintain, based on current income and expenses, a "minimal" standard of living for herself and her dependents if forced to repay the loans; (2) that additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period of the student loans; and (3) that the debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans.For the reasons set forth in the district court's order, we adopt this analysis.The first part of this test has been applied frequently as the minimum necessary to establish "undue hardship."See, e.g., Bryant v. Pennsylvania Higher Educ. Assistance Agency(In re Bryant), 72 B.R. 913, 915(Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987);North Dakota State Bd. of Higher Educ. v. Frech(In re Frech), 62 B.R. 235(Bankr.D.Minn.1986);Marion v. Pennsylvania Higher Educ. Assistance Agency(In re Marion), 61 B.R. 815(Bankr.W.D.Pa.1986).Requiring such a showing comports with common sense as well.

The further showing required by part two of the test is also reasonable in light of the clear congressional intent exhibited in section 523(a)(8) to make the discharge of student loans more difficult than that of other nonexcepted debt.Predicting future income is, as the district court noted, problematic.Requiring evidence not only of current inability to pay but also of additional, exceptional...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
999 cases
  • In re Thompson
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 22 Julio 2005
    ...of the United States Bankruptcy Code. In support of this proposition, Thompson argues that she meets each of the three prongs of the "Brunner test" for making a finding of undue hardship in this First, Thompson argues that she is maintaining a minimal standard of living. She argues that she......
  • Colonial Realty Co., In re
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 20 Noviembre 1992
    ...Prods. Corp.), 896 F.2d 1384, 1388 (2d Cir.1990) (conclusions of law reviewed de novo ) (citing Brunner v. New York State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp., 831 F.2d 395, 396 (2d Cir.1987) (per curiam)). The FDIC pursues three arguments on appeal. 7 First, the FDIC contends that its cause of action......
  • Posey v. US DEPT. OF TREASURY-IRS
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • 25 Junio 1993
    ...Worldwide Corp., 139 B.R. 585, 590 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.1992), aff'd, 993 F.2d 300 (2d Cir. 1993) (citing Brunner v. New York State Higher Educ. Serv. Corp., 831 F.2d 395, 396 (2d Cir.1987); In re O.P.M. Leasing Serv. Inc., 79 B.R. 161, 162 (Bankr. The parties in this case do not dispute the mat......
  • In re Coleman
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 25 Marzo 2009
    ...25. See, e.g., Brunner v. N.Y. State Higher Educ. Serv. Corp. (In re Brunner), 46 B.R. 752, 753 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 1985), aff'd, 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987) (noting that "[t]he existence of the adjective `undue' indicates that Congress viewed garden-variety hardship as[an] insufficient excuse ......
  • Get Started for Free
6 firm's commentaries
47 books & journal articles
  • Student Loans: The Most Special of Circumstances.
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Law Journal Vol. 93 No. 4, December 2019
    • 22 Diciembre 2019
    ...(9) 11 U.S.C. [section] 523(a)(8). (10) The undue hardship test in Brunner v. New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987) often makes student loan discharge an (11) In re Harmon, 446 B.R. 721, 726 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2011) (citing 11 U.S.C. [section] 707(b......
  • How the Courts Have Gone Astray in Refusing to Discharge Student Loans: The Folly of Brunner, of Rewriting Repayment Terms, of Issuing Partial Discharges and of Considering Income-Based Repayment Plans.
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Law Journal Vol. 95 No. 1, January 2021
    • 1 Enero 2021
    ...to discharge her student loan. Flander v. United States, 737 F. App'x 530, 531-32 (Fed. C?r. 2018). (3) 46 B.R. 752 (S.D.N.Y. 1985), affd, 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. (4) Brunner v. N.Y. State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp., 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987). (5) Kristi Rose Sutton & Inan Uluc, Student ......
  • The Alteration of Ex Ante Agreements by the Bankruptcy Code.
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Law Journal Vol. 95 No. 4, December 2021
    • 22 Diciembre 2021
    ...Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-647, [section] 3621, 104 Stat. 4789. (276) Brunner v. N.Y. State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp. (In re Brunner), 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. (277) Id. at 396. (278) Id. (279) Brunner v. N.Y. State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp. (In re Brunner), 46 B.R. 752, 754 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) (quo......
  • Bankruptcy - Robert B. Chapman
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 53-4, June 2002
    • Invalid date
    ...552. Id. at 721. 553. fed. R. bankr. P. 4007(b). 554. 180 b.R. 163 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 1995). 555. Brunner v. N.Y. State Higher Edu. Servs., 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987). 556. 269 B.R. at 721. See also Rubarts v. First Gibraltar Bank (In re Rubarts), 896 F.2d 107, 109 (5th Cir. 1990); Superior......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT