Bryan v. Cowles
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM. |
| Citation | Bryan v. Cowles, 152 N.C. 767, 68 S.E. 205 (N.C. 1910) |
| Decision Date | 27 May 1910 |
| Parties | BRYAN v. COWLES et al. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Watauga County; Councill, Judge.
Action by W. L. Bryan against Chas. H. Cowles and another, executors of Calvin J. Cowles, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Evidence held to support a quantum meruit claim for services in a sale of land.
Plaintiff brought this action against C.J. Cowles, deceased defendants' testator, before his decease, and after his death the present defendants qualified as his executors and were made parties. Plaintiff in first cause of action sues for $10,950, which he alleges is due him under a paper writing, dated February 13, 1897, and hereinafter set out on account of the alleged sale of the defendants' testator's timber lands; and in a second cause of action he sues for the same amount, which he alleges is due him upon the quantum meruit on account of alleged sale of said lands. Defendants denied any and all liability for plaintiff's claim. On the trial the jury rendered the following verdict Judgment on verdict for plaintiff, and defendants excepted and appealed.
Finley & Hendren, T. C. Bowie, and Manly & Hendren, for appellants.
L. D Lowe and T. A. Love, for appellee.
We have carefully considered the record and exceptions noted, and are of opinion that there has been no reversible error committed to defendants' prejudice.
It appeared that in 1903, 1904, and 1905, the testator, Calvin J. Cowles, had conveyed large bodies of mountain land, to wit, over 7,300 acres, to certain purchasers at an average price of $4 per acre; the amount received therefor being $29,364.40, and plaintiff claimed that these sales were brought about as result of plaintiff's labor and efforts and under and by virtue of a special contract between plaintiff and defendant plaintiff was to have all the proceeds of said sale over and above $2.50 per acre net to the owner, C.J. Cowles; the amount of plaintiff's demand in this aspect of the case being something over $10,000. In case this claim is not established, plaintiff makes demand on a quantum meruit for services rendered in effecting said sales. The court submitted the claim to the jury in both aspects and on a single issue, and the jury, as stated, rendered a verdict in plaintiff's favor for $5,000, for which judgment was entered.
On consideration of the testimony, we concur with defendants in the position that the plaintiff has failed to establish his claim made on the special contract. According to plaintiff this phase of his demand was made to rest on a letter written by the testator to plaintiff, in reference to a sale of these lands, bearing date February 13, 1897, and in terms as follows: --with evidence tending to show a sale after and in pursuance of authority contained in...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting