Bryan v. Freeman, No. 18938
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina |
| Writing for the Court | MOSS |
| Citation | 253 S.C. 50,168 S.E.2d 793 |
| Parties | G. W. BRYAN and Lynn S. Bryan, as Executors and Trustees of the Estate of J. E. Bryan, Sr., Kate Gillespie, Cushman Ward, Elsie McCoy Cushman Warwick and Harold Gillespie, Cushman, Jr., Appellants, v. William H. FREEMAN et al., Respondents. |
| Decision Date | 10 July 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 18938 |
Page 793
the Estate of J. E. Bryan, Sr., Kate Gillespie,
Cushman Ward, Elsie McCoy Cushman
Warwick and Harold Gillespie,
Cushman, Jr., Appellants,
v.
William H. FREEMAN et al., Respondents.
[253 S.C. 51] Howell V. Bellamy, Jr., Myrtle Beach, H. T. Abbott, Conway, for appellants.
J. Reuben Long, John C. Thompson, Conway, James P. Stevens, Loris, for respondents.
MOSS, Chief Justice.
G. W. Bryan and Lynn S. Bryan, an executors and trustees of the estate of J. E. Bryan, Sr., et al., the appellants herein, instituted this action against William H. Freeman, et al., the respondents herein, pursuant to Section 10--2401 of the 1962 Code of Laws of South Carolina, to remove a cloud on and quiet title to land described generally as 'Withers Swash', according to a map of 'Withers Heights Section', Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, made by T. M. Jordan, Registered C.E., and dated June, 1945, and recorded in [253 S.C. 52] the office of the Clerk of Court for Horry County, South Carolina, in Plat Book 25, at page 184.
The complaint alleges that the appellants are in possession of and have title to the foregoing land and that the respondents claim some right, title and interest in said property, which constitutes a cloud upon appellants' title. It is then alleged that the appellants are entitled to a decree declaring that the respondents have no right, title or claim of any nature whatsoever in and to the aforesaid property.
The respondents, by answers, pleaded a general denial and six other defenses, including the defense of paramount title to and possession of the land in question.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the action should be referred to the Master of Horry County for trial, pursuant to Section 10--2406 of the Code. The appellants so contend. It is the position of the respondents that an issue of title to real estate is raised by the pleadings and they have a right to a jury trial upon this issue. The trial judge sustained the position advocated by the respondents and this appeal is from such order.
An action to remove a cloud on and quiet title to land is one in equity. Cathcart v. Jennings, 137 S.C. 450, 135 S.E. 558. However, when the defendant's answer raises an issue of paramount title to land, such as would, if established, defeat plaintiff's action, it is the duty of the
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Johnson v. Arbabi, No. 3362.
...in equity. See Godfrey v. Webb, 277 S.C. 246, 285 S.E.2d 883 (1982) (ruling suit to set aside a tax deed is in equity); Bryan v. Freeman, 253 S.C. 50, 168 S.E.2d 793 (1969) (holding an action to quiet title is equitable in nature). Therefore, this Court may find facts according to our own v......
-
Equivest Fin., LLC v. Ravenel, Appellate Case No. 2015-002257
...on and quiet title to land is one in equity." Johnson v. Arbabi , 355 S.C. 64, 69, 584 S.E.2d 113, 115 (2003) (quoting Bryan v. Freeman , 253 S.C. 50, 52, 168 S.E.2d 793 (1969) ). "In an action at equity, tried by a judge alone, an appellate court may find facts in accordance with its own v......
-
Perry v. Heirs at Law and Distributees of Gadsden, No. 2080
...the property cannot be partitioned in kind. I. In South Carolina, an action to quiet title is equitable in nature Bryan v. Freeman, 253 S.C. 50, 168 S.E.2d 793 (1969); Hipps v. Hipps, 288 S.C. 564, 343 S.E.2d 669 (Ct.App.1986), as is an action for partition. Wolf v. Hayes, 161 S.C. 293, 159......
-
Forfeited Land Comm'n of Bamberg Cnty. v. Beard, Appellate Case No. 2014-002727
...2012. This appeal followed.STANDARD OF REVIEW"An action to remove a cloud on and quiet title to land is one in equity." Bryan v. Freeman , 253 S.C. 50, 52, 168 S.E.2d 793, 793 (1969). In actions at equity, tried before a judge alone, we are free to find the facts according to our own view o......
-
Johnson v. Arbabi, No. 3362.
...in equity. See Godfrey v. Webb, 277 S.C. 246, 285 S.E.2d 883 (1982) (ruling suit to set aside a tax deed is in equity); Bryan v. Freeman, 253 S.C. 50, 168 S.E.2d 793 (1969) (holding an action to quiet title is equitable in nature). Therefore, this Court may find facts according to our own v......
-
Equivest Fin., LLC v. Ravenel, Appellate Case No. 2015-002257
...on and quiet title to land is one in equity." Johnson v. Arbabi , 355 S.C. 64, 69, 584 S.E.2d 113, 115 (2003) (quoting Bryan v. Freeman , 253 S.C. 50, 52, 168 S.E.2d 793 (1969) ). "In an action at equity, tried by a judge alone, an appellate court may find facts in accordance with its own v......
-
Perry v. Heirs at Law and Distributees of Gadsden, No. 2080
...the property cannot be partitioned in kind. I. In South Carolina, an action to quiet title is equitable in nature Bryan v. Freeman, 253 S.C. 50, 168 S.E.2d 793 (1969); Hipps v. Hipps, 288 S.C. 564, 343 S.E.2d 669 (Ct.App.1986), as is an action for partition. Wolf v. Hayes, 161 S.C. 293, 159......
-
Forfeited Land Comm'n of Bamberg Cnty. v. Beard, Appellate Case No. 2014-002727
...2012. This appeal followed.STANDARD OF REVIEW"An action to remove a cloud on and quiet title to land is one in equity." Bryan v. Freeman , 253 S.C. 50, 52, 168 S.E.2d 793, 793 (1969). In actions at equity, tried before a judge alone, we are free to find the facts according to our own view o......