Bryant v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 8 Div. 600.
Decision Date | 28 February 1935 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 600. |
Citation | 230 Ala. 80,159 So. 685 |
Parties | BRYANT v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; A. E. Hawkins, Judge.
Action for malicious prosecution by Charles Talmadge Bryant against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Interrogatory to insurance company, in malicious prosecution action against insurance company for arrest of plaintiff on charge of arson as to communications between insurance company and state fire marshal made pursuant to law, held improper, since public policy demanded that such reports be unhampered in public interest (Code 1923, § 7772).
Count 1 of the complaint is as follows:
Count 2 alleges that: "The defendant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, a corporation, by and through its then agent and servant, Chester Raines, acting under authority of said corporation, or within the scope of his authority as agent, or by ratification or approval or acquiescence by said corporation, and the other defendants acting for themselves and all acting in concert and for a common purpose, wrongfully and maliciously and without probable cause therefor did cause the plaintiff to be indicted," etc.
Plaintiff propounded the following interrogatories to defendant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company:
John A. Lusk & Son, of Guntersville, for appellant.
O. D. Street, of Guntersville, Estes Doremus, of Atlanta, Ga., and Steiner, Crum & Weil, of Montgomery, for appellees.
Count 1 claims of defendants damages "for maliciously and without probable cause therefor, causing the plaintiff to be indicted by the grand jury * * * on a charge in substance: (setting out the indictment for arson) and to be arrested under a warrant or writ of arrest issued * * * on said indictment," etc.
The Code form of complaint for malicious prosecution...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prince v. Bryant
...Ala. 760; Williams v. Ivey, 37 Ala. 244; Holly v. Carson, 39 Ala. 345; Davis v. Sanders, 133 Ala. 275, 32 So. 499; Bryant v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 230 Ala. 80, 159 So. 685; Grissom v. Lawler, 10 Ala.App. 540, 65 So. 705; Casino Restaurant, Inc., v. McWhorter, 35 Ala.App. 332, 46 So.2d 582......
-
Glidden Co. v. Laney
... ... 475 GLIDDEN CO. et al. v. LANEY. 6 Div. 58Supreme Court of AlabamaJune 3, 1937 ... 29, 127 So. 188; ... Bryant v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 230 Ala. 80, 159 ... Trivers Clothing Co., 221 Ala. 29, ... 32(8), 127 So. 188; Standard Oil Co. v. Davis, 208 ... ...
-
Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Sunday
... ... 597 LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. v. SUNDAY. 3 Div. 465.Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 23, 1947 ... 146, 52 So. 596, ... and Bryant v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 230 Ala. 80, ... 84, ... ...
-
Huffstutler v. Edge
...willful suppression of known material facts. King v. Second National Bank & Trust Co., 234 Ala. 106, 173 So. 498; Bryant v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 230 Ala. 80, 159 So. 685; American Surety Co. v. Pryor, 217 Ala. 244, 115 So. 176. It is quite manifest from the quoted excerpt from the opinio......