Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co.

CourtWashington Supreme Court
CitationBryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co., 847 P.2d 480, 120 Wn.2d 1027 (Wash. 1993)
Decision Date03 February 1993
PartiesBryant (William R., Maxine B.) v. Palmer Coking Coal Company, John Does I through X, Jane Does I through X, Kombol (William, Jane Doe), John Doe and Jane Doe Partnership NO. 59809-6

Petition For Review: Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Marriage of Ferree, In re
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • August 19, 1993
    ... ... McGhan, 45 Wash.2d 430, 432, 275 P.2d 729 (1954); Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal [856 P.2d 709] Co., 67 Wash.App. 176, 179, 834 P.2d ... ...
  • SYKES v. ELLENBURG CAPITAL CORPORATION
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • April 16, 1999
    ...CR 2A; RCW 2.44.010; Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co., 67 Wn. App. 176, 179 (1992), 858 P.2d 1110 (1993) (as modified), review denied, 120 Wn.2d 1027 (1993). In Ferree, this court articulated the reasons for the rule: "{T}he purpose of CR 2A is to insure that negotiations undertaken to aver......
  • Howard v. Dimaggio
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • July 27, 1993
    ... ... McGhan, 45 Wash.2d 430, 432, 275 P.2d 729 (1954); see also Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co., 67 Wash.App. 176, 179, 834 P.2d 662 (1992), ... ...
  • Morris v. Maks
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • April 26, 1993
    ... ... Long, 76 Wash. 480, 484, 136 P. 673 (1913) ...         In Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co., 67 Wash.App. 176, 834 P.2d 662 (1992), review ... ...
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...11.6(3), 11.7(1), 19.8(1), 26.6(7)(a), 52.6(10)(b) Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co., 67 Wn.App. 176, 858 P.2d 1110 (1992), review denied, 120 Wn.2d 1027 (1993): 2A.6 Bryne v. Cooper, 11 Wn.App. 549, 523 P.2d 1216, review denied, 84 Wn.2d 1013 (1974): 44.1.3 Buckley v. Snapper Power Equip. C......
  • §2A.6 Analysis
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 2A Rule 2A.Stipulations
    • Invalid date
    ...by plaintiff or assented to in open court); Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co., 67 Wn.App. 176, 179, 858 P.2d 1110 (1992), review denied, 120 Wn.2d 1027 (1993) (finding Stottlemyre not persuasive in light of clear case law holding that "noncompliance with the statute and court rule governing ......
  • §54.03 Agreements and Their Enforceability
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Family Law Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 54 Marital Agreements
    • Invalid date
    ...by CR 2A and RCW 2.44.010, it is not enforceable. Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co., 67 Wn. App. 176, 858 P.2d 1110 (1992), review denied, 120 Wn.2d 1027 (1993). Thus, CR 2A is the enforcement mechanism for settlement agreements. It states as follows: No agreement or consent between parties ......