Bryant v. State
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | BATTLE, J. |
| Citation | Bryant v. State, 36 S.W. 188, 62 Ark. 459 (Ark. 1896) |
| Decision Date | 06 June 1896 |
| Parties | BRYANT v. STATE |
Appeal from Green Circuit Court, FELIX G. TAYLOR, Judge.
John Bryant was tried and convicted before a justice of the peace on an information filed by the prosecuting attorney, alleging that, being the owner of the old Baird Saloon building in the town of Paragould, in the county of Greene and state of Arkansas, he "did unlawfully sell and give away, and cause to be sold and given away, and keep for sale and to be given away, and allow to be kept for sale and to be given away, in said building, ardent, vinous, malt, fermented, and intoxicating liquors, without first having obtained a license," etc. He appealed to the circuit court, with similar result, and thereupon appealed to this court.
Reversed and remanded.
The appellant pro se.
No venue was proved in this case. Nor was it proved, as alleged that any sale of liquor was made in the "Baird Saloon building." Having so alleged, the state must prove it.
E. B Kinsworthy, Attorney General, for appellee.
Courts take judicial notice of the locations of towns, and the boundaries of counties. 12 Am. &. Eng. Enc. Law., p. 169. The evidence shows that the sheriff gave Davis the money to buy the whiskey, and in fifteen minutes he returned with the whiskey. It was an impossibility for the witness to have gone out of the county within the time.
The evidence adduced in the trial of the appellant in the circuit court failed to show that he sold and gave away, and caused to be sold and given away, and kept for sale and to be given away, and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Wilhite v. State
...allegation can not be rejected as surplusage. Id. §§ 482, 485-6. See also 9 Ark. 193; 10 Ark. 259; 22 Ark. 251; 30 Ark. 131; 36 Ark. 168; 62 Ark. 459; 66 Ark. 120; 17 S.W. 725; Roscoe's Crim. Ev. 101-2; Sumner, 12; 15 Me. 476; 30 Me. 29; 67 Me. 567; 19 N.H. 133; 34 N.H. 529; 11 Mass. 93; 20......
-
Carleton v. State
... ... Ark. 364] sufficient to have alleged the name of one drink ... and have proved another. Here the pleader has elected to ... charge the sale of "intoxicating spirits, called ... Buk." The word "Buk" becomes descriptive of ... the offense, and must be proved as charged. Bryant ... v. State, 62 Ark. 459, 36 S.W. 188; Value ... v. State, 84 Ark. 285, 286, 105 S.W. 361; ... [196 S.W. 125] ... Marshall v. State, 71 Ark. 415, 75 S.W ... 584; Adams v. State, 64 Ark. 188, 41 S.W ... 423; Thompson v. State, 37 Ark. 408; ... Blackwell v. State, 36 Ark. 178; ... Reed ... ...
-
Hughes v. State
...and remanded. COUNSEL: Appellant pro se. The allegations and proof must correspond. 5 Ark. 72; 32 Ark. 609; 55 Ark. 244, 389; 13 Ark. 688; 62 Ark. 459. The of the court were improper. 51 Ark. 147; 54 Ark. 489; 60 Ark. 76; 35 Ark. 458; 60 Ark. 425; 59 N.E. 508; 29 S.E. 691; 29 So. 11; 60 P. ......
-
Winston v. State
...is not sufficient. The words "commonly called whiskey" used in the indictment are descriptive of the offense charged. 129 Ark. 362, 364; 62 Ark. 459; Ark. 285; 71 Ark. 415; 64 Ark. 188; 37 Ark. 408; 141 Ark. 276. One offense cannot be proved by evidence of another, unless the two are so rel......