Buchanan v. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Decision Date21 January 1929
Docket Number3374
Citation9 La.App. 424,119 So. 703
PartiesBUCHANAN v. C. R. I. & P. RY. CO. and BURTON
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US

Appeal from the Eighth Judicial District Court, Parish of Winn. Hon F. E. Jones, Judge.

Action by Frederick Buchanan and Wife against Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, and A. P. Burton.

There was judgment for defendants and plaintiffs appealed.

Judgment affirmed.

T. A Carter, of Alexandria, attorney for plaintiffs, appellants.

A Leonard Allen, of Winnfield, attorney for defendant appellee, A. P. Burton.

Barksdale, Warren and McBride, of Ruston, attorneys for defendant, appellee, Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company.

OPINION

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

REYNOLDS J.

The plaintiffs, Frederick Buchanan and his wife, Mrs. Irma M. Buchanan, sue the defendants, A. P. Burton and Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, to recover damages for the death of their child, Verna Marion Buchanan, aged between three and four years, caused, it is alleged, by the negligence of the defendants, or either of them.

Both defendants filed exceptions of no cause and no right of action, which were sustained by the trial court, and plaintiffs' demands were rejected and their suit dismissed, and they have appealed.

OPINION

The material allegations of the petition are as follows:

"That A. P. Burton, . . . is a citizen and resident of Winn Parish State of Louisiana, and that the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company is a railway corporation engaged in the business of a common carrier . . . that in due course of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company's business, under a contract with one A. P. Burton, certain cross-ties . . . were placed upon the right of way of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company . . . in the town of Winnfield, Winn parish, Louisiana . . . That the ties were either the property of the said A. P. Burton or . . . of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. That your petitioner is unable to ascertain whether the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company owned the ties or whether the said A. P. Burton owned the ties. Your petitioner shows that there was a trail or path used by the public in going to and from the ice house, which was located near the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company's tracks, and that it was the custom of families residing in certain sec...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Emery v. Thompson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 12, 1941
    ... ... R. A. 825; Kramer v ... Southern Ry. Co., 37 S.E. 468, 52 L. R. A. 359; Carr ... v. Oregon-Washington Ry. Co., 261 P. 899; 60 A. L. R ... 1434; Macon D. S. Railroad Co. v. Jordan, 129 S.E ... 433, 34 Ga.App. 350; Gainey v. International & G. N. Ry ... Co., 280 S.W. 852; Buchanan v. C., R. I. & P. Ry ... Co., 119 So. 703. In all of the above cases, suits were ... instituted for damages for injuries to children, while ... playing on and around railroad ties on railroad property ... Under the attractive nuisance doctrine the courts held that ... plaintiffs were not ... ...
  • Anderson v. Peters
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • July 23, 1938
    ... ... Rotondi, 91 W.Va. 482, 113 S.E. 760, 36 A.L.R. 6; Macon, D. & S. R. Co. v. Jordan, 34 Ga. App. 350, 129 S.E. 443; Annotations: 36 A.L.R. 34-294; 53 A.L.R. 1344; 60 A.L.R. 1444; 19 L.R.A.,N.S., 1094-1165; See Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Ray, 124 Tenn. 16, 134 S.W. 858, Ann.Cas.1912D, 910; Buchanan v. Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 1929, 9 La. App. 424, 119 So. 703; Gainey v. International & G. N. R. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 1926, 280 S.W. 852 ...         In Missouri K. & T. R. Co. v. Edwards, supra, the court said: ...         "Is a pile of ties any more alluring than a pile of wood ... ...
  • Anderson v. Peters
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • July 23, 1938
    ... ... 760, 36 A.L.R. 6; Macon, D. & S. R ... Co. v. Jordan, 34 Ga.App. 350, 129 S.E. 443; ... Annotations: 36 A.L.R. 34-294; 53 A.L.R. 1344; 60 A.L.R ... 1444; 19 L.R.A.,N.S., 1094-1165; See Louisville & N. R ... Co. v. Ray, 124 Tenn. 16, 134 S.W. 858, Ann.Cas.1912D, ... 910; Buchanan v. Chicago R.I. & P. Ry. Co., 1929, 9 ... La. App. 424, 119 So. 703; Gainey v. International & G ... N. R. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 1926, 280 S.W. 852 ...          In ... Missouri K. & T. R. Co. v. Edwards, supra, the court said: ...          "Is ... a pile of ties any more ... ...
  • Gaylord Container Corporation v. Miley
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • March 27, 1956
    ...44 La.Ann. 339, 10 So. 678, and is not contrary to the cases of Peters v. Pearce, 146 La. 902, 84 So. 198, and Buchanan v. Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 9 La.App. 424, 119 So. 703. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT