Buck v. Cecere, Civ. No. 672.

Decision Date11 May 1942
Docket NumberCiv. No. 672.
Citation45 F. Supp. 441
PartiesBUCK et al. v. CECERE.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of New York

Hancock, Dorr, Ryan & Shove, of Syracuse, N. Y. (Louis D. Frohlich and Jack M. Nitzburg, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Chacchia, Lynch & Roberts, of Geneva, N. Y., for defendant.

BURKE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action under the Copyright Law, 17 U.S.C.A. § 25, to enjoin the defendant's performance of the musical composition "We Three" and for damages for an alleged performance. The evidence warrants a finding that the number was played in defendant's restaurant on April 5, 1941, without plaintiffs' consent. The defense that the use of ASCAP music, if use was made of it, was without the defendant's consent and contrary to his orders, is without merit. Buck v. Jewell-La Salle Realty Co., 283 U.S. 191, 198, 51 S.Ct. 410, 75 L.Ed. 971, 76 A.L.R. 1266; M. Witmark & Sons v. Pastime Amusement Co., D.C., 298 F. 470, affirmed 4 Cir., 2 F.2d 1020; Buck et al. v. Coe, D.C., 32 F.Supp. 829.

The defendant set forth in his answer a separate defense that the plaintiffs are furthering a monopolistic scheme in violation of Acts of Congress forbidding monopolies and agreements in restraint of trade. Infringement of a copyright is a tort. Ted Browne Music Co. v. Fowler, 2 Cir., 290 F. 751. The defense alleged is not available to a defendant in an action for infringement of a copyright. M. Witmark & Sons v. Pastime Amusement Co., supra; F. A. D. Andrea, Inc., v. Radio Corp. of America, D.C., 14 F.Supp. 226, and authorities cited. Affirmed 3 Cir., 88 F.2d 474. Judgment for plaintiffs as prayed for with damages of $250 and attorneys fees of $100 and costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Remick Music Corp. v. Interstate Hotel Co. of Nebraska
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska
    • December 9, 1944
    ...D.C.Mass., 25 F.Supp. 317; Buck v. Dacier, D.C., 26 F.Supp. 37; Buck v. Savoia Restaurant, Inc., D.C.N.Y., 27 F. Supp. 289; Buck v. Cecere, D.C.N.Y., 45 F.Supp. 441; Associated Music Publishers v. Debs Memorial Radio Fund, D.C.N.Y., 46 F.Supp. 829; Shapiro-Bernstein & Co. v. Veltin, D.C.La.......
  • Trebuhs Realty Co. v. News Syndicate Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • October 10, 1952
    ...1931, 53 F.2d 641; General Electric Co. v. Minneapolis Electric Lamp Co., D.Minn., 1924, 10 F.2d 851. Copyrights: e. g., Buck v. Cecere, W.D.N.Y., 1942, 45 F.Supp. 441; Vitagraph v. Grobaski, W.D.Mich., 1931, 46 F.2d 813. 2 Some of the earliest cases, however, did not too closely search out......
  • Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda Fine Arts
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 23, 1947
    ...Radio Corporation of America, D. C.Del., 1936, 14 F.Supp. 226; Buck v. Newsreel, Inc., 1938, D.C.Mass., 25 F. Supp. 787; Buck v. Cecere, 1942, W.D. N.Y., 45 F.Supp. 441. 13 Bruce v. American Can Co., 1947, 330 U.S. 743, 67 S.Ct. 1015, 91 L.Ed. ...
  • United Artists Associated, Inc. v. NWL CORPORATION
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • May 24, 1961
    ...787; Society of European Stage Authors and Composers, Inc. v. WCAU Broadcasting Co., D.C.E.D.Pa.1940, 35 F.Supp. 460; Buck v. Cecere, D.C.W.D.N.Y.1942, 45 F. Supp. 441; Harms, Inc. v. Sansom House Enterprises, Inc., D.C.E.D.Pa.1958, 162 F.Supp. 129, affirmed sub nom. Leo Feist Inc. v. Lew T......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT