Bugs ‘R‘ United States, LLC v. McCants
Decision Date | 18 November 2016 |
Docket Number | 1150650 |
Parties | BUGS 'R' US, LLC v. Autumn Willard MCCANTS. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Amber M. Whillock of Starnes Davis Florie LLP, Birmingham; and W. Warren Butler and Jordan W Gerheim of Starnes Davis Florie LLP, Mobile, for appellant.
Benjamin C. Maumenee, Silverhill, for appellee.
Bugs "R" Us, LLC ("BRU"), appeals from the Baldwin Circuit Court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration in an action filed by Autumn Willard McCants against BRU alleging negligent and/or wanton termite inspection of a house she purchased. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case.
According to McCants, on November 6, 2014, she entered into an agreement with Adrian Johns and Myra Johns to purchase the property and residence located at 705 East Fifth Street in Bay Minette ("the property"). On January 13, 2015, BRU issued an "Official Alabama Wood Infestation Inspection Report" ("WIIR"), which indicated that an inspection had revealed no visible evidence of active or previous infestation of various organisms, including powder-post—wood-boring—beetles. The WIIR was signed by the BRU agent who performed the inspection on January 13, 2015. The document states that "[t]his report ... must be signed by the buyer [and] a legible copy of this signature page must be returned to the inspecting company by the person ordering the inspection." The WIIR did not contain an arbitration clause. The WIIR is signed by McCants and dated January 16, 2015. McCants alleges that the Johnses paid for the WIIR inspection and report.
Also on January 13, 2015, BRU issued a "Termite Damage Protection Agreement" ("the termite contract") for termite-control and protection services. The termite contract identifies McCants as the "customer." McCants alleges that the Johnses also paid for the termite contract. The termite contract states that it is "[e]ffective with the date of initial treatment for one year thereafter." The date of initial treatment, as indicated in the WIIR, was January 13, 2015. The termite contract is signed by a BRU representative and the signature is dated January 13, 2015. It is undisputed that the termite contract is also signed by McCants and that her signature is dated March 6, 2015. Just above the signature lines, the termite contract states: "The terms and conditions on the reverse side of this agreement including the mandatory arbitration agreement are part of this agreement."
The reverse side of the termite contract contains the following arbitration clause:
(Emphasis added.)
On March 6, 2015, McCants closed on the property and obtained a warranty deed from the Johnses. McCants alleges that she closed on the property in reliance upon statements made by BRU in the WIIR. As already noted, on the same date, March 6, 2015, McCants signed the termite contract. McCants alleges that after she moved into the property she discovered that the residence "had a severe infestation of powder post beetles and was severely damaged by that infestation."
On October 22, 2015, McCants sued BRU in the Baldwin Circuit Court, alleging that BRU negligently and/or wantonly inspected the property and prepared and provided the WIIR, upon which she relied in purchasing the property, and that she subsequently discovered a severe infestation of wood-boring organisms that had caused significant damage to the property.
On January 28, 2016, BRU filed a motion to compel arbitration. BRU attached the termite contract, without any attachment, to its motion, and it submitted an affidavit from the owner of BRU, Robert Urias, who testified that BRU's business involves interstate commerce. Urias did not mention the termite contract in his affidavit.
On February 15, 2016, BRU filed a reply to McCants's responses to its motion to compel. BRU attached to its reply an attachment to the termite contract that consisted of a graph of the property and McCants's signature dated March 6, 2015.
On February 23, 2016, the trial court entered an order that simply stated: "Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Bugs R Us, LLC, is hereby DENIED." BRU filed a timely appeal of that order.
Vann v. First Cmty. Credit Corp. , 834 So.2d 751, 752–53 (Ala. 2002) (emphasis omitted).
Under the foregoing standard, BRU has the burden of proving the existence of an arbitration agreement and that the contract containing the arbitration agreement evidences a transaction affecting interstate commerce. BRU introduced an arbitration agreement that contains signatures of a BRU representative and McCants, and, through the uncontradicted affidavit testimony of BRU's owner, BRU demonstrated the relation of the termite contract to interstate commerce.
McCants contends, however, that BRU did not meet its burden of proving the existence of an arbitration agreement because, she says, the termite contract was never introduced into evidence in the trial court. McCants notes that the termite contract was attached to BRU's motion to compel arbitration but that it was not authenticated in accordance with Rule 44, Ala. R. Civ. P. In other words, BRU failed to present any testimony verifying the authenticity of the termite contract because the only testimony it produced concerned the interstate nature of the transaction underlying the contract. McCants argues that the same is true of the attachment to the termite contract containing a graph of the property that BRU attached to its reply in response to McCants's opposition to the motion to compel arbitration. Nothing accompanies that document to authenticate it.
To this effect, McCants has filed with this Court a ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wiggins v. Warren Averett, LLC
...222 ; Managed Health Care Admin., Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, 249 So. 3d 486, 493 (Ala. 2017) ; Bugs "R" Us, LLC v. McCants, 223 So. 3d 913, 919 (Ala. 2016) ; Anderton, 164 So. 3d at 1102 ; and CitiFinancial Corp., L.L.C. v. Peoples, 973 So. 2d 332, 340 (Ala. 2007). Wiggins......
-
Eickhoff Corp. v. Warrior Met Coal, LLC
...(Ala. 2017) ; Managed Health Care Admin., Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, 249 So. 3d 486 (Ala. 2017) ; Bugs "R" Us, LLC v. McCants, 223 So.3d 913 (Ala. 2016) ; Reedstrom; Anderton v. Practice–Monroeville, P.C., 164 So.3d 1094, 1102 (Ala. 2014) ; and Auto Owners Ins., Inc. v. Bl......
-
Performance Builders, LLC v. Lopas
...evidence of the parties’ intent to submit issues of arbitrability to the arbitrator. See 164 So. 3d at 1101-02." Bugs "R" Us, LLC v. McCants, 223 So. 3d 913, 918-19 (Ala. 2016). Rule 7(a) of the AAA Commercial Rules provides: "The arbitrator shall have the power to rule on his or her own ju......
-
Performance Builders, LLC v. Lopas
...of the parties' intent to submit issues of arbitrability to the arbitrator. See 164 So. 3d at 1101-02."Bugs "R" Us, LLC v. McCants, 223 So. 3d 913, 918-19 (Ala. 2016). Rule 7(a) of the AAA Commercial Rules provides: "The arbitrator shall have the power to rule on his or her own jurisdiction......