Buhmeier v. State
Decision Date | 20 June 1934 |
Docket Number | No. 26078.,26078. |
Citation | 190 N.E. 857,206 Ind. 645 |
Parties | BUHMEIER v. STATE. |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Vanderburgh Circuit Court; John W. Spencer, Judge.
Burtis Buhmeier, impleaded with another, was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
A. E. Gore and Ollie C. Reeves, of Evansville, for appellant.
James M. Ogden, Atty. Gen., and James T. Dowling, Dept. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Appellant was convicted of burglary, and assigns as error the action of the trial court in overruling his motion for a new trial. The grounds for new trial were that the finding of the trial court was not sustained by sufficient evidence, and was contrary to law.
Appellant's brief, under “Points and Authorities” and in “Argument,” presents but two particulars wherein the evidence is alleged to be insufficient to sustain the finding. They are that it does not appear that the offense was committed (1) in Vanderburgh county in the state of Indiana, and (2) within five years before commencement of the prosecution. Appellant contends that in these particulars “the only proof in the record, is that the offense was committed on the 5th day of March in Evansville.”
An examination of the record discloses that “on the 20th day of May, the same being the 69th Judicial day of March Term, 1931, of the Vanderburgh Circuit Court,” the evidence was heard in the cause. The transcript of the direct examination of Linus Knapp, witness for the state and owner of the house which appellant and one Brown were alleged to have burglarized, contains the following:
***
“
It appeared from the evidence that the alleged burglary took place while Brown was rooming at the home of appellant's mother and grandmother where appellant also lived. The transcript of appellant's examination is, in part, as follows:
***
There was uncontradicted evidence that a radio was taken in the commission of the burglary here charged. The transcript of the examination of appellant's mother is, in part, as follows:
***
From the foregoing testimony given on May 20, 1931, it was clearly established that the alleged burglary was committed on the previous 5th day of March, 1931, in the city of Evansville. This court will take judicial notice of the fact...
To continue reading
Request your trial