Bullcoming v. Mexico
| Decision Date | 28 September 2010 |
| Docket Number | No. 09–10876.,09–10876. |
| Citation | 131 S.Ct. 62 (Mem),561 U.S. 1058,177 L.Ed.2d 1152 |
| Parties | Donald BULLCOMING, petitioner, v. NEW MEXICO. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Mexico granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
State v. Griep
...States Supreme Court accepted a petition in State v. Bullcoming, 147 N.M. 487, 226 P.3d 1 (2010). See Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 561 U.S. 1058, 131 S.Ct. 62, 177 L.Ed.2d 1152 (2010) (granting certiorari). The court of appeals held Griep's case in abeyance pending the outcome in Bullcoming be......
-
State v. Telles, 28,943.
...issues of law that we review de novo. State v. Bullcoming, 2010–NMSC–007, ¶ 10, 147 N.M. 487, 226 P.3d 1, cert. granted, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 62, 177 L.Ed.2d 1152 (2010). {15} Our Supreme Court has applied the analysis in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d ......
-
State v. Gutierrez
...¶ 11, 147 N.M. 487, 226 P.3d 1 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), cert. granted, Bullcoming v. N.M., ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 62, 177 L.Ed.2d 1152 (2010). At issue here is whether the statements made on the videotape were testimonial. {14} “Statements are non [-] testimonial w......
-
State v. Telles
...STATE OF NEW MEXICO", Plaintiff-Appellee, v.FRANKIE TELLES, Defendant-Appellant.Docket No. 28,943COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICOFiling Date: April 28, 2011 \xC2"...Questions of admissibility under the Confrontation Clause are issues of law that we review de novo. State v. Bullcoming, 2010-NMSC-007, ¶10, 147 N.M. 487, 226 P.3d 1, cert. granted, 131 S. Ct. 62 (2010). {15} Our Supreme Court has applied the analysis ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Grabbing the Bullcoming by the Horns: How the Supreme Court Could Have Used Bullcoming v. New Mexico to Clarify Confrontation Clause Requirements for Csi-type Reports
...120. SeeQuestionPresentedsupra note 18. 121. See State v. Bullcoming, 226 P.3d 1 (N.M. 2010), cert.granted Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 131 S. Ct. 62 122. Id. at 4. 123. Id. 124. Id. 125. Id. 126. Id. at 4-5. 127. Id. at 5. 128. Id. 129. Id. 130. Id. 131. Id. 132. Id. 133. Id. 134. Id. at 5-6.......