Bullock v. Philip Morris Usa, Inc., No. B164398.

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtCroskey
Citation138 Cal.App.4th 1029,42 Cal.Rptr.3d 140
PartiesJodie BULLOCK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., Defendant and Appellant; Michael J. Piuze, Objector and Appellant.
Decision Date21 April 2006
Docket NumberNo. B169083.,No. B164398.
42 Cal.Rptr.3d 140
138 Cal.App.4th 1029
Jodie BULLOCK, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., Defendant and Appellant;
Michael J. Piuze, Objector and Appellant.
No. B164398.
No. B169083.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3.
April 21, 2006.

[42 Cal.Rptr.3d 147]

Law Offices of Michael J. Piuze, Michael J. Piuze and Geraldine Weiss, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Arnold & Porter, Ronald C. Redcay, Los Angeles, and Murray R. Garnick, for Defendant and Appellant.

Haight, Brown & Bonesteel, Rita Gunasekaran, Maureen Haight Gee, Los Angeles; Law Offices of Michael J. Piuze, Michael J. Piuze and Geraldine Weiss, Los Angeles, for Objector and Appellant.

CROSKEY, J.


Philip Morris USA, Inc. (Philip Morris), a cigarette manufacturer, appeals a judgment in favor of Betty Bullock awarding her compensatory and punitive damages after a jury trial. Philip Morris challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict on several counts based on products liability and fraud, the jury instructions, the admission of evidence, and the punitive damages award. Jodie Bullock, Betty Bullock's successor in interest, also appeals challenging a conditional new trial order reducing the amount of punitive damages by way of remittitur.1 Bullock's attorney, Michael J. Piuze, appeals an order awarding attorney fees against him as a sanction.

We conclude that the refusal of Philip Morris's proposed jury instructions on punitive damages was proper and hold that the extreme reprehensibility of Philip Morris's conduct justifies a ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages significantly greater than a single-digit. We also conclude that Philip Morris has shown no error with respect to liability or punitive damages and that Bullock has shown no error in the remittitur, and therefore affirm the judgment. Finally, we hold that the court had no authority to award attorney fees as a sanction and therefore reverse the sanctions order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Factual Background2

Bullock smoked cigarettes manufactured by Philip Morris for 45 years from 1956, when she was 17 years old, until she was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2001. She smoked Philip Morris's Marlboro brand of cigarettes until 1966, and then switched to its Benson & Hedges brand.

Scientific and medical professionals in the United States and worldwide generally agreed by the late 1950's that cigarette smoking caused lung cancer, after several epidemiological studies reached that conclusion. Philip Morris and other cigarette

42 Cal.Rptr.3d 148

manufacturers sought to cast doubt on the increasing body of knowledge supporting the conclusion that smoking caused lung cancer and sought to assuage smokers' concerns. To that end, Philip Morris and other cigarette manufacturers issued a full-page announcement in newspapers throughout the United States in January 1954 entitled "A Frank Statement to Cigarette Smokers." The announcement stated, "Recent reports on experiments with mice have given wide publicity to a theory that cigarette smoking is in some way linked with lung cancer in human beings," and stated, "[d]istinguished authorities point[ed] out" that there was no proof that cigarette smoking caused cancer and that "numerous scientists" questioned "the validity of the statistics themselves."

The Frank Statement stated, "We accept an interest in people's health as a basic responsibility, paramount to every other consideration in our business. [¶] We believe the products we make are not injurious to health. [¶] We always have and always will cooperate closely with those whose task it is to safeguard the public health." It announced the formation of the Tobacco Industry Research Committee and stated, "We are pledging aid and assistance to the research effort into all phases of tobacco use and health. This joint financial aid will of course be in addition to what is already being contributed by individual companies. [¶] ... [¶] In charge of the research activities of the Committee will be a scientist of unimpeachable integrity and national repute. In addition there will be an Advisory Board of scientists disinterested in the cigarette industry. A group of distinguished men from medicine, science, and education will be invited to serve on this Board. These scientists will advise the Committee on its research activities." In the years that followed, the Tobacco Industry Research Committee and its publicists disseminated the message that there was no proof that cigarette smoking was a cause of lung cancer and other diseases through news releases, distribution of research and editorial materials favorable to the tobacco industry, personal contacts with editors, journalists, and producers, and other means.

Philip Morris for many years publicly continued to insist that there was no consensus in the scientific community that cigarette smoking was a cause of lung cancer and that Philip Morris was actively pursuing scientific research to resolve the purported controversy, while privately acknowledging that there was no true controversy, that its true goal was to discredit reports that linked smoking with lung cancer, and that Philip Morris had no intention of funding research that would reveal the health hazards of smoking. The Tobacco Institute, a trade organization funded by Philip Morris and other cigarette manufacturers, issued a press release in 1961 discrediting a recent article and stating that the views that smoking caused cancer "are a subject of much disagreement in the scientific world" and "the cause or causes of lung cancer continue to be unknown." The Tobacco Institute stated in a press release in 1963 that the tobacco industry was "vitally interested in getting the facts that will provide answers to questions about smoking and health," and described the industry's research efforts as a "crusade for research — in the agricultural stations, the scientific laboratories, and the great hospitals and medical centers of the nation." It stated, "the industry does not know the causes of the diseases in question."

A cigarette company executive appearing before Congress in 1965 on behalf of several cigarette manufacturers, including Philip Morris, stated that "[n]early everyone familiar with these difficult problems

42 Cal.Rptr.3d 149

will agree ... that there is a very high degree of uncertainty" whether "smoking causes cancer or any other disease." Later that year, the Tobacco Institute issued a press release stating, "Research to date has not established whether smoking is or is not causally involved in such diseases as lung cancer and heart disease, despite efforts to make it seem otherwise. The matter remains an open question — for resolution by scientists." The press release stated, "we are earnestly trying to find the answers," and, "If there is something in tobacco that is causally related to cancer or any other disease, the tobacco industry wants to find out what it is, and the sooner the better. If it is something in tobacco or the smoke, I am sure this can be remedied by the scientists."

Philip Morris's chief executive officer and chairman of the Executive Committee of the Tobacco Institute, Joseph Cullman III, stated on the television news program Face the Nation (CBS, Jan. 3, 1971), "if any ingredient in cigarette smoke is identified as being injurious to human health, we are confident that we can eliminate that ingredient." He stated further, "We do not believe that cigarettes are hazardous; we don't accept that." The Tobacco Institute issued a report in 1979 entitled Smoking and Health 1969-1979: the Continuing Controversy, stating, "Scientists have not proven that cigarette smoke or any of the thousands of its constituents as found in cigarette smoke cause human disease." The Tobacco Institute issued a report in 1984 entitled The Cigarette Controversy: Why More Research is Needed, stating, "it is not known whether smoking has a role in the development of various diseases ... a great deal more research is needed to uncover the causes and the mechanisms involved in their onset." The 1984 report stated that the theory that cigarette smoking causes various diseases "is just that, a theory" and stated, "There were basic flaws in the methods used in the major epidemiological surveys that cast doubts on the accuracy of the claimed correlations."

Contrary to its repeated public pronouncements, the evidence shows that Philip Morris privately acknowledged the link between cigarette smoking and lung cancer and other diseases and sought to avoid promoting any research that would reveal that link. An internal document prepared by Philip Morris in 1961 for purposes of research and development stated, "Carcinogens are found in practically every class of compounds in smoke," and provided a "partial list" of 40 "carcinogens" in cigarette smoke.

A 1970 memorandum from a Philip Morris research scientist to its president stated of the Council for Tobacco Research, the successor of the Tobacco Industry Research Committee, "It has been stated that CTR is a program to find out `the truth about smoking and health.' What is truth to one is false to another. CTR and the Industry have publicly and frequently denied what others find as `truth.' Let's face it. We are interested in evidence which we believe denies the allegation that cigaret smoking causes disease." Notes from a 1978 meeting of cigarette company executives and legal counsel state that the Tobacco Industry Research Committee "was set up as an industry `shield' "and that the Council for Tobacco Research "has acted as a `front.'"

Dr. William Farone, a chemist employed by Philip Morris as a scientific researcher beginning in 1976 and as Director of Applied Research from 1977 to 1984, testified at trial that his superiors informed him that cigarette smoking caused cancer and was addictive when he first began to work for the company. Dr. Farone testified...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT