Bunch v. Board of Review, Rhode Island Dept. of Employment and Training
Decision Date | 25 February 1997 |
Docket Number | No. 95-163-M,95-163-M |
Citation | 690 A.2d 335 |
Parties | C. Mae BUNCH, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING. P. |
Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
This case comes before us on a petition for certiorari filed by the Department of Children, Youth and Families seeking review of a judgment of the District Court that sustained the appeal of C. Mae Bunch (claimant) from a decision of the Board of Review of the Department of Employment and Training (board of review). The board of review had upheld the denial of unemployment-compensation benefits to claimant. We grant the petition for certiorari and quash the judgment of the District Court. The facts of the case insofar as pertinent to this petition are as follows.
The claimant in this case was employed by the Department of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF) as superintendent of the Rhode Island Training School for Youth. On February 5, 1994, she called the West Warwick police department, seeking their assistance in finding an intruder in her basement. When the police arrived, claimant was on an upstairs landing holding a machete in her hand. Claimant was first asked to put the machete aside. She did so and then advised the police that she heard strange noises emanating from her basement and believed someone was there. She appeared to Patrolman Timothy Poulin to be nervous and emotional. He and another officer conducted a search of the bottom level of the house and found neither an intruder, nor sign of forced entry. The claimant asked the officers to search the entire house in order to allay her fears. In the course of this consensual search, Officer Poulin discovered a white powder that he believed to be a controlled substance, along with accompanying drug paraphernalia in the master bedroom. As a result of this discovery the officer admonished the claimant of her Miranda rights and brought her to the West Warwick police station. She was subsequently released from custody and returned to her home pending examination of the substance by the state toxicology laboratory. The substance later was determined at the toxicology laboratory to be cocaine.
That same evening claimant called her supervisor, the DCYF director, Linda D'Amario Rossi (director), to advise her of the incident, but claimant did not disclose that she had been taken into custody, that drug paraphernalia and items suspected of being controlled substances had been seized from the master bedroom of her home, and that she had been advised that the West Warwick police might proceed with a possible criminal prosecution.
On February 6 a member of the West Warwick police informed the director that they had discovered a substance believed to be narcotics and also drug paraphernalia and that, depending on toxicology results, the police department intended to proceed with a criminal prosecution. They also informed the director that claimant had been detained and had been advised of her Miranda rights.
On February 6, 1994, claimant again called the West Warwick police department and asked that it send someone to her residence. This time she was holding a two-inch by four-inch piece of wood and claimed that an intruder was in her home. A search indicated that there was no intruder and no sign of forced entry. The claimant expressed no confidence in the officers' findings. She insisted that her neighbors were not talking to her and that the police had "bugged" her telephone lines and were determined "to get" her.
The board of review by a majority decision affirmed the findings of the referee with one member dissenting on the ground that the misconduct was not related to the claimant's employment. A judge of the District Court reversed the decision of the board of review on the ground that there was no evidence of job-related misconduct proven against claimant. He emphasized that claimant was dismissed from her employment because she was accused of committing a crime while off duty and because she had failed to disclose the facts surrounding the occurrence of February 5, 1994. He found as a fact that the circumstances upon which the criminal charges were based were not related to her official duties and, therefore, did not disqualify her from unemployment...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Champlin's Realty Associates v. Tikoian, C.A. No. PC 06-1659 (R.I. Super 2/23/2009), C.A. No. PC 06-1659.
...agencies only when they are "totally devoid of competent evidentiary support in the record." Bunch v. Bd. of Review, Rhode Island Dept. of Employment and Training, 690 A.2d 335, 337 (R.I. 1997) (quoting Milardo v. Coastal Resources Management Council of Rhode Island, 434 A.2d 266, 272 (R.I.......
-
Riley v. The Narragansett Pension Board
... ... A. No. WC-2019-0445 Superior Court of Rhode Island, Washington June 10, 2020 ... ), the Pension Board has the authority to review a ... pension recipient's continuing ... or malfeasance relate to one's employment and ... (b) Mrs. Riley is entitled to all ... Department of Employment and Training Board of Review , ... 637 A.2d 360, 363 ... be drawn from such evidence." Bunch v. Board of ... Review, Rhode Island ... ...
-
Holmes v. Rhode Island Dep't of Human Servs.
...reviewed de novo. Narragansett Wire Co. v. Norberg, 118 R.I. 596, 607, 376 A.2d 1, 6 (R.I. 1977); Bunch v. Bd. of Review, R.I. Dep't of Employment & Training, 690 A.2d 335, 337 (R.I. 1997). It is inherent in the power of this Court to order a remand to the administrative agency to "correct ......
-
Sherman v. Gifford, C.A. No. PC-2006-3245 (R.I. Super 8/21/2009)
...agencies when they are "`totally devoid of competent evidentiary support in the record.'" Bunch v. Bd. of Review, Rhode Island Dept. of Employment and Training, 690 A.2d 335, 337 (R.I. 1997) (quoting Milardo v. Coastal Resources Management Council of Rhode Island, 434 A.2d 266, 272 (R.I. 19......