Bunting v. Hogsett

Decision Date05 January 1891
Citation21 A. 34,139 Pa. 363
Docket Number231
PartiesHENRY C. BUNTING v. ROBERT HOGSETT; PHOEBE J. BUNTING v. ROBERT HOGSETT
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued: November 8, 1890

OPINION

HOGSETT'S APPEAL, NO. 105.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK:

For reasons given in our opinion filed in the case of Henry C. Bunting v. Robert Hogsett, No. 104 October Term 1890, the

Judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
57 cases
  • Shultz v. Old Colony St. Ry.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 3 Enero 1907
    ... ... Pa ... Ry. Co., 129 Pa. 514 544, 18 A. 718, 6 L. R. A. 143, 15 ... Am. St. Rep. 733; Bunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 363, ... 376, 21 A. 31, 33, 34, 12 L. R. A. 268, 23 Am. St. Rep. 192; ... Little v. Cent. District & Printing Telegraph Co., ... ...
  • Shultz v. Old Colony St. Ry.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 3 Enero 1907
    ...in Dean v. Pa. Ry. Co., 129 Pa. 514 544,18 Atl. 718, 6 L. R. A. 143, 15 Am. St. Rep. 733; Bunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 363, 376, 21 Atl. 31, 33, 34, 12 L. R. A. 268, 23 Am. St. Rep. 192; Little v. Cent. District & Printing Telegraph Co., 213 Pa. 229, 62 Atl. 848. It has never been applied in......
  • McAuley v. Wills
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 11 Mayo 1983
    ... ... In addition, the unforeseeability of the manner in which a result is brought about does not relieve the defendant of responsibility. Bunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 363, 21 A. 31 (1890) ... The Damage Issue ...         Again, this is an area where the jury, guided by proper ... ...
  • Fishburn v. Burlington & Northwestern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • 9 Mayo 1905
    ... ... Gilson v. Delaware C. Co. , ... 65 Vt. 213 (26 A. 70, 36 Am. St. Rep, 810); Hill v ... Winsor , 118 Mass. 251; Bunting v. Hogsett , 139 ... Pa. 363 (21 A. 31, 33, 34, 12 L.R.A. 268, 23 Am. St. Rep ... 192); Higgins v. Dewey , 107 Mass. 494 (9 Am. Rep ... 63); ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT