Bunting v. Hogsett

Decision Date05 January 1891
CitationBunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 363, 21 A. 34 (Pa. 1891)
Docket Number231
PartiesHENRY C. BUNTING v. ROBERT HOGSETT; PHOEBE J. BUNTING v. ROBERT HOGSETT
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued: November 8, 1890

OPINION

HOGSETT'S APPEAL, NO. 105.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK:

For reasons given in our opinion filed in the case of Henry C. Bunting v. Robert Hogsett, No. 104 October Term 1890, the

Judgment is affirmed.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
57 cases
  • Shultz v. Old Colony St. Ry.
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • January 3, 1907
    ... ... Pa ... Ry. Co., 129 Pa. 514 544, 18 A. 718, 6 L. R. A. 143, 15 ... Am. St. Rep. 733; Bunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 363, ... 376, 21 A. 31, 33, 34, 12 L. R. A. 268, 23 Am. St. Rep. 192; ... Little v. Cent. District & Printing Telegraph Co., ... ...
  • Shultz v. Old Colony St. Ry.
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • January 3, 1907
    ...in Dean v. Pa. Ry. Co., 129 Pa. 514 544,18 Atl. 718, 6 L. R. A. 143, 15 Am. St. Rep. 733; Bunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 363, 376, 21 Atl. 31, 33, 34, 12 L. R. A. 268, 23 Am. St. Rep. 192; Little v. Cent. District & Printing Telegraph Co., 213 Pa. 229, 62 Atl. 848. It has never been applied in......
  • McAuley v. Wills
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • May 11, 1983
    ... ... In addition, the unforeseeability of the manner in which a result is brought about does not relieve the defendant of responsibility. Bunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 363, 21 A. 31 (1890) ... The Damage Issue ...         Again, this is an area where the jury, guided by proper ... ...
  • Fishburn v. Burlington & Northwestern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1905
    ... ... Gilson v. Delaware C. Co. , ... 65 Vt. 213 (26 A. 70, 36 Am. St. Rep, 810); Hill v ... Winsor , 118 Mass. 251; Bunting v. Hogsett , 139 ... Pa. 363 (21 A. 31, 33, 34, 12 L.R.A. 268, 23 Am. St. Rep ... 192); Higgins v. Dewey , 107 Mass. 494 (9 Am. Rep ... 63); ... ...
  • Get Started for Free