Buras v. BIRMINGHAM FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, 20421.

Decision Date10 January 1964
Docket NumberNo. 20421.,20421.
PartiesMrs. Yvonne BURAS, Widow of Oliver V. Adolph, Appellant, v. BIRMINGHAM FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Reginald T. Badeaux, Jr., Robert R. Gisevius and John J. Cummings, III, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

P. A. Bienvenu, Bienvenu & Culver, and Timothy J. McNamara, New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before CAMERON, WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The narrow question presented here is whether the exaction provided for by LSA-R.S. 22:6561 is interest, or is not interest, in determining whether the amount involved is sufficient to hold federal jurisdiction over this case.

The district court determined, upon appellant's declaration, that the exaction was in the nature of a penalty, not interest. We think this holding is correct.

The State of Louisiana has a statutory interest rate of 5%, which is in derogation of deciding this 6% exaction interest also. Moreover, the 6% is not due if the insurance contract is settled within 60 days. The federal statute2 sets the minimum in removals at $10,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs. We hold that this exaction is intended to be in the nature of a coercive penalty towards prompt settlement. The statutory amount here sued for is, therefore, sufficient. The appellant's complaint states, according to LSA-R.S. 22:656, that the

"* * * defendant has refused and/or neglected to pay petitioner under said policy for more than 60 days, and said refusal on the part of the defendant is arbitrary, capricious, unwarranted and without probable cause and therefore the Petitioner is entitled to an award of penalties as provided for in the Insurance Code of the State of Louisiana."

The Supreme Court and this Court has uniformly, in resolving such questions, looked to the amount the plaintiff in good faith demands and, here, it exceeds $10,000.00.

Affirmed.

1 "§ 656 Payment of claims; life policies; penalty

"All death claims arising under policies of insurance issued or delivered within this state shall be settled by the insurer within sixty days from the date of receipt of due proof of death and should the insurer fail to do so without just cause, then the amount due shall bear interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from date of receipt of due proof of death by the insurer until paid." Amended and reenacted Acts 1958, No. 125.

2 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Howard v. Office of Special Deputy Receiver
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas
    • February 14, 2022
    ... ... Company's … Motions to Dismiss Pursuant to ... Howard's (Plaintiff) insurance claim for an unpaid 1995 ... settlement ... , 134 F.3d at 1255 (applying Buras v ... Birmingham Fire Insurance Co. of ... ...
  • Rayford v. New York Life Insurance Company
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • May 8, 1973
    ...of death by the insurer until paid. The "interest" provision in this statute has been held to be a penalty, Buras v. Birmingham Fire Ins. Co. of Pa., 327 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1964), and thus has no effect on the awarding of pre-judgment legal interest where the conditions necessary for imposi......
  • Brown v. Globe Life & Accident Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • September 29, 2015
    ...is therefore not excluded from the amount in controversy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)-(a)(1). Buras v. Birmingham Fire Ins. Co. of Pa., 327 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1964). Globe Life calculates the recoverable interest for one year to be at least $4,350. (R. Doc. 7 at 7). Plaintiff also allege......
  • St. Paul Reinsurance Co., Ltd. v. Greenberg, 97-20294
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • February 10, 1998
    ...had a reasonable basis for denying coverage. Higginbotham v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 103 F.3d 456, 461 (5th Cir.1997).22 327 F.2d 238 (5th Cir.1964).23 Id. at 238-39.24 Tex.Ins.Code Ann. art. 21.55 § 8 (West Supp.1997).25 See Maryland Ins. Co. v. Head Indus. Coatings and Servs., Inc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT