Burchinal v. United States

Decision Date23 March 1965
Docket NumberNo. 7741.,7741.
Citation342 F.2d 982
PartiesJames Robert BURCHINAL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Raymond S. Duitch, Colorado Springs, Colo., for appellant.

Robert E. Long, Asst. U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo. (Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

Burchinal appeals from a conviction on two counts of an indictment charging him, as president and sole stockholder of a corporation, with having knowingly and fraudulently transferred and concealed the proceeds of a sale of corporate property in contemplation of bankruptcy and with the intent to defeat the bankruptcy law, and with making a false oath regarding the same assets, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152.

Burchinal operated a retail furniture business known as "Factory Showrooms, Inc.", in Denver, Colorado. During the early months of 1962 business had been poor and the corporation was in financial distress. Creditors were pressing for payment of their respective accounts. The business owed approximately $90,000, far more than the value of its assets. In April of 1962 Burchinal discussed the possibility of a sale of broken lots and damaged pieces of furniture with Harold S. Stein, a merchandise liquidator. This sale, which constituted one-fourth to one-third of the corporation's total inventory, was finally consummated the latter part of May, 1962. Stein paid for the merchandise with an $8400 check payable to the corporation, and received a bill of sale therefor dated May 31, 1962. Stein testified that in his opinion the value of the merchandise he purchased was approximately $14,000. Burchinal told an F.B.I. agent that it was worth $20,000. It is the $8400 received from Stein that Burchinal was alleged to have unlawfully concealed and transferred.

An attorney representing a number of judgment creditors of the corporation, after many unsuccessful attempts to arrange for payment of the judgments, advised Burchinal on May 31, 1962 that he intended to levy execution on the company's inventory. On the same day Burchinal endorsed the $8400 check and delivered it to his wife, who deposited it, together with other funds of the corporation, in a bank at Littleton, Colorado, using her maiden name of Charline McKenzie. The levy was subsequently executed on June 4, 1962, at which time all of the property on the debtor's premises was removed and put into storage.1 Thereafter, on July 18, 1962, an attorney acting for three of the corporation's creditors filed on their behalf an involuntary petition in bankruptcy against Factory Showrooms, Inc. On the 1st day of August, 1962, in the required statement of affairs of the bankrupt corporation, Burchinal stated under oath that no property of the bankrupt had been transferred within the past 12 months other than in the ordinary course of business.

Charline McKenzie testified that she thought the money which she had deposited in the Littleton bank belonged to Factory Showrooms. She said the defendant wanted to pay some bills, but that his other bank account had been attached by creditors. She said the checks she wrote on the account went to pay company bills and salaries. However, the account in the Littleton bank was depleted by checks payable to either Burchinal or his wife. The account was closed out on June 13, 1962 when Mrs. Burchinal withdrew the balance of over $8,000 in cash. Mrs. Burchinal explained the withdrawals by stating that the money was deposited in two other banks, but the record discloses that she purchased a cashier's check with $3,500 of the money.2

The appellant testified that he considered the account in Charline's name to be a trust account for the benefit of Factory Showroom creditors, that the $8,400 went to pay only corporate creditors, and only with his approval. He said he received only a small part of the amount for his personal use.

The Referee in Bankruptcy testified that the $8400 transaction with Stein was never mentioned in either of the two bankruptcy hearings. The Referee stated, however, that the appellant did say that there had been an account of about $8,000 to $9,000 in the Littleton Bank in Charline's name, and that the account was created to avoid the garnishment proceedings at the other bank.

The first count of the indictment is phrased in the language of paragraph 6 of 18 U.S.C. § 152, which provides:

"Whoever, either individually or as an agent or officer of any person or corporation, in contemplation of a bankruptcy proceeding by or against him or any other person or corporation, or with intent to defeat the bankruptcy law, knowingly and fraudulently transfers or conceals any of his property or the property of such other person or corporation * * *."

The second count is phrased in the language of the second paragraph of the same section, which provides:

"Whoever knowingly and fraudulently makes a false oath or account in or in relation to any bankruptcy proceeding * * *."

For either of such violations the offender may be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.3 The principal assignment of error is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction.

An offense is complete under...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • In re May
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida
    • October 16, 1980
    ...United States v. Fallman, 28 F.Supp. 251 (D.Mass.1939); see also, In Re Davis, 404 F.2d 312 (2nd Cir. 1968); Burchinal v. United States, 342 F.2d 982 (10th Cir. 1965); Sultan v. United States, 249 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1957); In Re Quackenbush, 102 F. 282 A reading of the foregoing authorities......
  • United States v. Lindemuth
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • June 14, 2017
    ...disclosure or recognition.'" United States v. Turner, 725 F.2d 1154, 1157 (8th Cir. 1984) (citation omitted); Burchinal v. United States, 342 F.2d 982, 985 (10th Cir. 1965); see also United States v. Love, 17 F. App'x 796, 800 n.5 (10th Cir. 2001) (discussing United States v.Turner favorabl......
  • Peterson v. Peterson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • August 26, 1968
    ...Verona Constr. Co., 126 F.2d 976, 977, footnote 3 (3 Cir. 1942); In re Glazier, 195 F. 1020, 1021 (M.D.Pa.1912); Burchinal v. United States, 342 F.2d 982, 985 (10 Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 843, 86 S.Ct. 46, 15 L.Ed.2d Here the petition originally alleged concealment and refusal to d......
  • United States v. Lawson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • April 27, 1966
    ...conduct charged was done knowingly or with intent to defeat the bankruptcy laws. This is for the jury to resolve. Burchinal v. United States, 342 F.2d 982 (10th Cir. 1965). The statute and the Indictment are not unduly vague or Delay— Defendant's final challenge to the Indictment is premise......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT