Burd v. Smith
Decision Date | 01 January 1802 |
Citation | 4 Dall. 76,1 L.Ed. 748,4 U.S. 76 |
Parties | Burd, Plaintiff in Error, v. Smith, Lessee of Fitzsimons et al. High Court of Errors and Appeals of Pennsylvania |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
ERROR from the Supreme Court, on a judgment entered in pursuance of the following agreement:
'Montgomery county.
'Richard Smith, lessee of Thomas Fitzsimons, William M'Mutrie, Samuel W. Fisher, Philip Nicklin, and Isaac Wharton, v. Edward Burd.
'Ejectment for 130 acres of land in Perkiomen township, in Montgomery county.
'It is agreed that the above action be entered, as an amicable action of trespass and ejectment, on the Circuit Court docket of Montgomery county, as of March term 1800; that a declaration and pleadings be filed, and issue joined conformably thereto that the annexed state of a case be filed as of June term 1800, in the nature of a special verdict, with an entry of the confession of lease entry and ouster; that judgment be rendered thereon for the plaintiff, without prejudice to the title, or right, of either party; that a writ of error on the said judgment be taken from the Supreme Court, tested as of the last day of last December term of the same Court, and returnable in the same Court on the first day of March term following; that the said judgment be affirmed, of course, in the said Supreme Court, as of the same term, without prejudice to the right of either party; and that no advantage be taken of any error in the form of the said proceedings, but every thing be done to give them validity.'
The material facts, contained in the case, to which the agreement refers, were these: 'That the title deeds of the land, mentioned in the declaration, were delivered to Mr. Dallas, by Mr. Blair M'Clenachan, previous to the 2d day of September 1797, to enable him to draw a trust deed from M'Clenachan to him and Mr. Huston; which was, accordingly, drawn, and delivered by Mr. Dallas to Mr. M'Clenachan for the purpose of having the same executed.
'That Blair M'Clenachan and P. Moore, jointly, or separately, not being able to satisfy and discharge the said debts, Blair M'Clenachan, on the 2d of September 1797, made and executed a certain indenture for several estates, including the premises in the declaration mentioned, to A. J. Dallas and John H. Huston, containing (among other things) the following trusts, conditions, and stipulations:
And this indenture was acknowledged on the 4th of September 1797, by the said Blair M'Clenachan, in the absence of Mr. Dallas, one of the trustees, and no proof was given whether the other trustee was present, or not. It was recorded in Philadelphia on the 24th of November, and in Montgomery county, on the 27th of December, 1797.
'That the yellow fever prevailed in the city of Philadelphia from the latter end of August, until the latter end of October, or beginning of November, 1797; during which the said trustees were absent from the city; but a communication with some of the printers of the city was kept open, during the whole period, by the medium of the post-office.
'That on the said 4th day of September 1797 Edward Burd (the defendant in the ejectment) obtained a judgment in the Supreme Court, against the said B. M'Clenachan, for 5,333 dollars, and 33 cents, besides interest and costs, with a stay of execution for 60 days. A fi. fa. was issued and returned upon this judgment, in the usual form to ground a testatum; and, on the 15th of November 1797, a testatum fi. fa. was issued to the sheriff of Montgomery county, which was delivered to the sheriff on the next day. On the 24th of November, levy was made upon the premises in the declaration mentioned; on the 8th of December an inquisition was held on the premises, which were condemned; on the 7th of March 1798, a vend. exponas issued to the sheriff of Montgomery, and the premises were, thereupon, in due form sold to the said Edward Burd, for 930l.; on the 27th of March 1798, the sheriff made, and acknowledged in open Court, a deed for the premises to the said Edward Burd; and shortly afterwards delivered to him the possession.
'That the said Edward Burd had no knowledge, or notice, of the execution, or existence, of the deed of trust to Dallas and Huston, or of the proceedings under it, until subsequent to the 12th of December 1797.
'That, on the 24th of November 1797, the trust deed was in the possession of the trustees, or one of them, by delivery of the said B. M'Clenachan; but when the same was so delivered is not known. The other title deeds remained in the possession of Mr. Dallas during the yellow fever of 1797, and until they were delivered by him to the lessors of the plaintiff.
'That, on the 15th of December 1796, an advertisement was published, calling a meeting of the creditors of B. M'Clenachan, and of M'Clenachan and Moore; and at the meeting, on the 17th of December, the creditors appointed a committee, though the minutes of the appointment, &c. were not signed. This committee, on the 19th of December 1796, published an advertisement called a caution, against making any purchases, or accepting any conveyances of B. M'Clenachan's estate, from him, or his children; to which M'Clenachan published an answer, on the same day; and,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
US v. Edwards
...fifty states, as well as by the federal law, and have been so recognized since the dawn of the Republic. See, e.g., Burd v. Smith, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 76, 1 L.Ed. 748 (1802). In Burd, one Mr. Blair M'Clenachan, heavily in debt, purported to convey by indenture of trust various real properties ......
-
Grubbs v. Morris
...demonstrates its injustice, and many other courts have expressed similar views. Cunningham v. Freeborn, 11 Wend. 240,vide 256; Burd v. Smith, 4 Dall. 76;Pingree v. Comstock, 18 Pick, 46;Atkinson v. Jordan, Wright, 246; Beers v. Lyon, 21 Conn. 610. In a respectable treatise upon the subject ......
-
Grubbs v. Morris
...demonstrates its injustice, and many other courts have expressed similar views. Cunningham v. Freeborn, 11 Wend. 240, vide p. 256; Burd v. Smith, 4 Dall. 76; v. Comstock, 18 Pick. 46; Atkinson v. Jordan, 5 Ohio 293; Beers v. Lyon, 21 Conn. 604. In a treatise on conveyances in trust and assi......
-
In re Wilson
...the only case in the books, apart from Hennessey v. The West. Bank, where releases were demanded and all the property passed, is Burd v. Fitzsimmons, 4 Dall. 76, and it was there held to avoid the instrument. In Thomas v. Jenks it was assumed that Lippincott v. Barker, 2 Binn. 174, had deci......
-
The Fraudulent Conveyance Origins of Chapter 11: an Essay on the Unwritten Law of Corporate Reorganizations
...the creditors of the grantor, but equally it is illegal if made with an intent to hinder and delay them."11. See id.12. Burd v. Smith, 4 Dall. 76 (1802).13. See Harman v. Fishar, 98 Eng. Rep. 998 1 Cowp. 118, 122 (1774).14. Id. at 998.15. Id.16. Id.17. Id.18. Id. at 1000.19. Id. at 1001.20.......