Burdine v. Johnson
| Decision Date | 05 December 2000 |
| Docket Number | PETITIONER-APPELLEE,RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,No. 99-21034,99-21034 |
| Citation | 234 F.3d 1339 |
| Parties | (5th Cir. 2000) CALVIN JEROLD BURDINE,v. GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Robert Lee McGlasson, II (argued), Decatur, GA, Mandy Welch, Burr & Welch, Houston, TX, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Julie Caruthers Parsley (argued), Edward Larry Marshall, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; David Hittner, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion October 27, 2000, 5 Cir., 2000, 231 F.3d 950)
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Capital punishment: advocates' deadly combination of inadequacy and misconduct.
...State v. Smith, 581 So. 2d 497 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990). (36) See Burdine v. Johnson, 231 F.3d 950, 962 (5th Cir. 2000), vacated by 234 F.3d 1339 (5th Cir. 2000) (rehearing allowed when defense counsel slept during (37) See Goodwin v. Balkcom, 684 F.2d 794, 805, n.13 (11th Cir. 1982) (noting ......