Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Docket No. 12685.

• Decision Date: 02 June 1948
• Docket Number: Docket No. 12685.
• Citation: 10 T.C. 1007
• Parties: BURKE AND HERBERT BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
• Court: U.S. Tax Court

10 T.C. 1007

BURKE AND HERBERT BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, PETITIONER,

v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Docket No. 12685.

Tax Court of the United States.

Promulgated June 2, 1948.

The taxpayer indicated on its tax return an election to include tax-free interest in excess profits tax net income and by section 720(b), Internal Revenue Code, thereby gained the right to include in invested capital the bonds and obligations producing such interest. By oversight or error it omitted a part of its tax-free interest; the Commissioner added it, and because of this adjustment the tax consequences of the election were disadvantageous. The election indicated, held, valid and binding, notwithstanding the unanticipated tax consequences, and the determined adjustment within its framework is sustained. Lionel B. Farr, Esq., for the petitioner.

George J. LeBlanc, Esq., for the respondent.

OPINION.

JOHNSON, Judge:

The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $3,529.32 in petitioner's excess profits tax for 1942 by adding to excess profits tax net income tax-free interest on bonds of the Home Owners Loan Corporation. Petitioner indicated on its return an election to include tax-free interest in such net income, thereby gaining the right to reflect such bonds in invested capital, and did in fact include other tax-free interest in the net income. It assails the determination on the ground that the election, intended as a relief measure, was indicated without full knowledge of the tax consequences, and is not binding since such consequences are disadvantageous if the additional interest is included. It argues, further, that the omission of the interest is a noncompliance with prescribed conditions, which invalidates the indicated election.

This proceeding was submitted upon a stipulation and exhibits, which we adopt by reference as findings of fact and from which it appears that:

Petitioner, a Virginia corporation is a bank and trust company with principal office at Alexandria, Virginia. It filed its 1942 excess profits tax return, prepared on the basis of cash receipts and disbursements, with the collector of internal revenue for the district of Virginia, and computed its excess profits credit for 1942 by the method based on invested capital. On its return question (e) was answered thus:

(e) In computing the excess profits credit under the invested capital method, do you elect to include in excess profits net income interest received on, reduced by the amount of amortizable bond premium under section 125 attributable to, all Government obligations described in section 22(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code? (Answer ‘yes‘ or ‘no‘) Yes.

In computing excess profits tax net income petitioner added to its normal tax net income $3,300.11 consisting of interest received on state obligations and Federal Land Bank bonds issued prior to March 1, 1941, but did not add to normal tax net income interest of $2,210.79 received on bonds of the Home Owners Loan Corporation, which, like the amounts added, represented interest on obligations described in section 22(b)(4). The Commissioner added the omitted interest in the amount of $1,547.77 (as reduced by amortizable bond premium) to the excess profits tax net income. In computing its adjusted excess profits tax net income and excess profits tax credit, petitioner did not include among inadmissible assets any amount on account of state obligations or bonds of the Home Owners Loan Corporation or Federal Land Banks.

On its 1942 excess profits tax return petitioner affirmatively indicated an election to include in its normal tax net income amounts of interest (less amortizable premium) which were tax-free under section 22(b)(4), Internal Revenue Code. By such an election a taxpayer acquires the right to treat the bonds and obligations producing the tax-free interest as ‘admissible assets‘ in invested capital, which is used as a factor in arriving at the excess profits credit computed under section 714. This election is granted by section 720(d), which, petitioner plausibly argues, was intended to afford relief, and should be liberally construed to that end. Colson Corporation, 5 T.C. 1035. In computing its tax, petitioner reflected the tax-free bonds and obligations in invested capital, and increased normal tax net income by $3,300.11 representing a part of its tax-free interest on bonds and obligations, but by oversight or error failed to add $1,547.77 ($2,210.79 less amortization) of tax-free interest on other bonds. The Commissioner added it, but the result of the addition on tax was such that petitioner would have benefited by failing to make the election indicated on the return.

Petitioner now contends that the indicated election is not binding and should be disregarded for three reasons, to wit: It was made without full knowledge of the facts; the...