Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic
| Docket Number | 2015-1127 |
| Decision Date | 07 December 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
-
State ex rel. Thomas v. McGinty
..." In re Grand Jury Proceeding of Doe , 150 Ohio St.3d 398, 2016-Ohio-8001, 82 N.E.3d 1115, ¶ 21, quoting Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic , 151 Ohio St.3d 356, 2016-Ohio-8000, 89 N.E.3d 536, ¶ 30 (lead opinion). Similarly, here, once Counts and the defense team have conducted the inspection gran......
-
Thomasson v. Thomasson
...may be affected by an order to produce documents (different from what has already been recognized, see Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic , 151 Ohio St.3d 356, 2016-Ohio-8000, 89 N.E.3d 536, ¶ 30 (lead opinion)). It is difficult to conceive of a substantial right that may be affected by an order r......
-
BouSamra v. Excela Health
...not the client. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co. , 32 F.3d 851, 866 (3d Cir. 1994) ; Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic , 151 Ohio St.3d 356, 89 N.E.3d 536, 541 (2016) ; see also Magnetar Tech. Corp. v. Six Flags Theme Park, Inc. , 886 F.Supp.2d 466, 479 (D. Del. 2012) ("[T]he work p......
-
Blue Techs. Smart Sols. v. Ohio Collaborative Learning Sols.
... ... privilege, is immediately appealable. Burnham v ... Cleveland Clinic, 151 Ohio St.3d 356, 2016-Ohio-8000, 89 ... N.E.3d 536. The court ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
MASTERING ESSENTIAL ASPECTS OF THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, WORK PRODUCT IMMUNITY, AND LAWYERS' ETHICAL DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
...LLC, 981 N.E.2d 345, 356 (Ill. 2012); Att'y Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Powers, 164 A.3d 138, 151 (Md. 2017); Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic, 89 N.E.3d 536, 541 (Ohio 2016); Arnoldy v. Mahoney, 791 N.W.2d 645, 657 (S.D. 2010); In re XL Specialty Ins. Co., 373 S.W.3d 46, 49 (Tex. 2012). [8] See,......