Burns v. Fortson 8212 901

Decision Date19 March 1973
Docket NumberNo. 72,72
Citation93 S.Ct. 1209,35 L.Ed.2d 633,410 U.S. 686
PartiesKathryn BURNS et al. v. Ben FORTSON, etc., et al. —901
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

By statute, Georgia registrars are required to close their voter registration books 50 days prior to November general elections, except for those persons who seek to rgister to vote for President or Vice President. Ga.Code Ann, §§ 34—611 and 34 602.* The District Court upheld the registration cutoff against appellants' constitutional attack based upon this Court's decision in Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 92 S.Ct. 995, 31 L.Ed.2d 274 (1972). This appeal followed.

The State offered extensive evidence to establish 'the need for a 50-day registration cut-off point, given the vagaries and numerous requirements of the Georgia elections laws.' Plaintiffs introduced no evidence. On the basis of the record before it, the District Court concluded that the State had demonstrated 'that the 50-day period is necessary to promote . . . the orderly, accurate, and efficient administration of state and local elections, free from fraud.' (Footnote omitted.) Although the 50-day registration period approaches the outer constitutional limits in this area, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. What was said today in Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, at 681, 93 S.Ct. 1211, at 1213, 35 L.Ed.2d 627, is applicable here:

'In the present case, we are confronted with a recent and amply justifiable legislative judgment that 50 days rather than 30 is necessary to promote the State's important interest in accurate voter lists. The Constitution is not so rigid that that determination and others like it may not stand.'

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice BLACKMUN, concurring in the result.

I concur only in the result, for I hesitate to join what, for me, is the Court's unnecessary observation that 'the 50-day registration period approaches the outer constitutional limits in this area.' I also concurred in the result in Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 92 S.Ct. 995, 31 L.Ed.2d 274 (1972), and said,

'It is, of course, a matter of linedrawing, as the Court concedes, ante, at 1006. But if 30 days pass constitutional muster, what of 35 or 45 or 75? The resolution of these longer measures, less than those today struck down, the Court leaves, I suspect, to the future.' Id., at 363, 92 S.Ct., at 1013.

I am not prepared to intimate at this point that a period of time in excess of 50 days cannot be sustained, no matter how supportive the record may be. In Blumstein, the Court struck down Tennessee's 90-day county durational residency requirement in part, I suppose, because it exceeded the State's 30-day registration period. Had the latter been 60 days, rather than 30, I suspect the Court would have indicated approval of a corresponding 60-day durational residency requirement. See 405 U.S., at 345—349, 92 S.Ct. at 1004—1006. I feel that each case in this area should be decided on its own record unrestricted by an arbitrary number-of-days figure.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice BRENNAN concur, dissenting.

For the same reasons that I gave in Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, 682, 93 S.Ct. 1211, 1213, 35 L.Ed.2d 627, I dissent from the affirmance of the judgment of the District Court. Unlike Arizona, Georgia does not use volunteer deputy registrars, a system that the Court in Marston thought created special problems warranting special treatment. Indeed, the State's expert witness in this case testified that there was something dangerous about using deputy registrars. Nor does Georgia have as late a primary as Arizona. As in Marston, appellees here did not show that it was impossible to increase the size of the registrars' staffs or their operations. Moreover, there was evidence that final lists of registered voters are not prepared until 14 days before...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Joseph v. City of Birmingham
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • March 11, 1981
    ...voters, the Supreme Court has expressly upheld some residency periods in the face of equal protection attacks. Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 93 S.Ct. 1209, 35 L.Ed.2d 633 (1973) and Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, 93 S.Ct. 1211, 35 L.Ed.2d 627 (1973) (50 days held constitutional). See als......
  • Anderson v. Celebrezze
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • April 19, 1983
    ...1 (1973). See also Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, 93 S.Ct. 1211, 35 L.Ed.2d 627 (1973) (Per Curiam); Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 93 S.Ct. 1209, 35 L.Ed.2d 633 (1973) (Per Curiam); American Party of Texas v. White, 415 U.S. 767, 94 S.Ct. 1296, 39 L.Ed.2d 744 (1974); Mandel v. Bradley, 4......
  • Colgrove v. Battin 8212 1442
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 21, 1973
    ...to rely on arbitrary demarcations in cases where constitutional rights depend on matters of degree. See, e.g., Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 93 S.Ct. 1209, 35 L.Ed.2d 633 (1973). But in cases where arbitrary lines are necessary, I would have thought it more consonant with our limited role......
  • Democracy N.C. v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • August 4, 2020
    ...routinely uphold voter registration deadlines as constitutional burdens on the right to vote. See Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 686–87, 93 S.Ct. 1209, 35 L.Ed.2d 633 (1973) (per curiam) (upholding Georgia's 50-day registration deadline, though it "approache[d] the outer constitutional lim......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Pruning the political thicket: the case for strict scrutiny of state ballot access restrictions.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 145 No. 2, December 1996
    • December 1, 1996
    ...scrutiny is `strict in theory, but fatal in fact.'" (citation omitted)); infra note 282 and accompanying text; see also Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686 (1973) (per curiam) (applying strict scrutiny and accepting state regulations that required a 50-day durational voter residency); Martson v.......
  • Reconnecting doctrine and purpose: a comprehensive approach to strict scrutiny after Adarand and Shaw.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 149 No. 1, November 2000
    • November 1, 2000
    ...478 U.S. 421 (1986); Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (controlling opinion of Powell, J.); Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686 (1973) (per curiam); Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679 (1973); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 163 (1973) (stating that after viability a state's inter......
  • Structuring judicial review of electoral mechanics: explanations and opportunities.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 156 No. 2, December 2007
    • December 1, 2007
    ...the Storer era, and often thereafter. See, e.g., Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, 682 (1973) (Marshall, J, dissenting); Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 688 (1973) (Marshall, J., dissenting); Rosario v. Rockefeller, 410 U.S. 752, 763 (1973) (Powell, J., dissenting); O'Brien v. Skinner, 414 U.......
  • Election Emergencies: Voting in the Wake of Natural Disasters and Terrorist Attacks
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 67-3, 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...cutoff (for election of state and local officials) is necessary to permit preparation of accurate voter lists."); Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 686-87 (1973) (per curiam) (upholding constitutionality of law requiring people to register to vote at least fifty days before an election, thoug......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT