Burns v. Fortson 8212 901
Decision Date | 19 March 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 72,72 |
Citation | 93 S.Ct. 1209,35 L.Ed.2d 633,410 U.S. 686 |
Parties | Kathryn BURNS et al. v. Ben FORTSON, etc., et al. —901 |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
By statute, Georgia registrars are required to close their voter registration books 50 days prior to November general elections, except for those persons who seek to rgister to vote for President or Vice President. Ga.Code Ann, §§ 34—611 and 34 602.* The District Court upheld the registration cutoff against appellants' constitutional attack based upon this Court's decision in Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 92 S.Ct. 995, 31 L.Ed.2d 274 (1972). This appeal followed.
The State offered extensive evidence to establish 'the need for a 50-day registration cut-off point, given the vagaries and numerous requirements of the Georgia elections laws.' Plaintiffs introduced no evidence. On the basis of the record before it, the District Court concluded that the State had demonstrated 'that the 50-day period is necessary to promote . . . the orderly, accurate, and efficient administration of state and local elections, free from fraud.' (Footnote omitted.) Although the 50-day registration period approaches the outer constitutional limits in this area, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. What was said today in Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, at 681, 93 S.Ct. 1211, at 1213, 35 L.Ed.2d 627, is applicable here:
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
I concur only in the result, for I hesitate to join what, for me, is the Court's unnecessary observation that 'the 50-day registration period approaches the outer constitutional limits in this area.' I also concurred in the result in Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 92 S.Ct. 995, 31 L.Ed.2d 274 (1972), and said,
Id., at 363, 92 S.Ct., at 1013.
I am not prepared to intimate at this point that a period of time in excess of 50 days cannot be sustained, no matter how supportive the record may be. In Blumstein, the Court struck down Tennessee's 90-day county durational residency requirement in part, I suppose, because it exceeded the State's 30-day registration period. Had the latter been 60 days, rather than 30, I suspect the Court would have indicated approval of a corresponding 60-day durational residency requirement. See 405 U.S., at 345—349, 92 S.Ct. at 1004—1006. I feel that each case in this area should be decided on its own record unrestricted by an arbitrary number-of-days figure.
For the same reasons that I gave in Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, 682, 93 S.Ct. 1211, 1213, 35 L.Ed.2d 627, I dissent from the affirmance of the judgment of the District Court. Unlike Arizona, Georgia does not use volunteer deputy registrars, a system that the Court in Marston thought created special problems warranting special treatment. Indeed, the State's expert witness in this case testified that there was something dangerous about using deputy registrars. Nor does Georgia have as late a primary as Arizona. As in Marston, appellees here did not show that it was impossible to increase the size of the registrars' staffs or their operations. Moreover, there was evidence that final lists of registered voters are not prepared until 14 days before...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Joseph v. City of Birmingham
...voters, the Supreme Court has expressly upheld some residency periods in the face of equal protection attacks. Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 93 S.Ct. 1209, 35 L.Ed.2d 633 (1973) and Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, 93 S.Ct. 1211, 35 L.Ed.2d 627 (1973) (50 days held constitutional). See als......
-
Anderson v. Celebrezze
...1 (1973). See also Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, 93 S.Ct. 1211, 35 L.Ed.2d 627 (1973) (Per Curiam); Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 93 S.Ct. 1209, 35 L.Ed.2d 633 (1973) (Per Curiam); American Party of Texas v. White, 415 U.S. 767, 94 S.Ct. 1296, 39 L.Ed.2d 744 (1974); Mandel v. Bradley, 4......
-
Colgrove v. Battin 8212 1442
...to rely on arbitrary demarcations in cases where constitutional rights depend on matters of degree. See, e.g., Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 93 S.Ct. 1209, 35 L.Ed.2d 633 (1973). But in cases where arbitrary lines are necessary, I would have thought it more consonant with our limited role......
-
Democracy N.C. v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections
...routinely uphold voter registration deadlines as constitutional burdens on the right to vote. See Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 686–87, 93 S.Ct. 1209, 35 L.Ed.2d 633 (1973) (per curiam) (upholding Georgia's 50-day registration deadline, though it "approache[d] the outer constitutional lim......
-
Pruning the political thicket: the case for strict scrutiny of state ballot access restrictions.
...scrutiny is `strict in theory, but fatal in fact.'" (citation omitted)); infra note 282 and accompanying text; see also Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686 (1973) (per curiam) (applying strict scrutiny and accepting state regulations that required a 50-day durational voter residency); Martson v.......
-
Reconnecting doctrine and purpose: a comprehensive approach to strict scrutiny after Adarand and Shaw.
...478 U.S. 421 (1986); Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (controlling opinion of Powell, J.); Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686 (1973) (per curiam); Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679 (1973); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 163 (1973) (stating that after viability a state's inter......
-
Structuring judicial review of electoral mechanics: explanations and opportunities.
...the Storer era, and often thereafter. See, e.g., Marston v. Lewis, 410 U.S. 679, 682 (1973) (Marshall, J, dissenting); Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 688 (1973) (Marshall, J., dissenting); Rosario v. Rockefeller, 410 U.S. 752, 763 (1973) (Powell, J., dissenting); O'Brien v. Skinner, 414 U.......
-
Election Emergencies: Voting in the Wake of Natural Disasters and Terrorist Attacks
...cutoff (for election of state and local officials) is necessary to permit preparation of accurate voter lists."); Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686, 686-87 (1973) (per curiam) (upholding constitutionality of law requiring people to register to vote at least fifty days before an election, thoug......