Burpee v. Burpee
| Decision Date | 10 October 1912 |
| Citation | Burpee v. Burpee, 109 Me. 379, 84 A. 648 (Me. 1912) |
| Parties | BURPEE v. BURPEE et al. |
| Court | Maine Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Judicial Court, Knox County, at Law.
In the matter of the estate of Samuel H. Burpee, deceased. From a decree appointing Samuel A. Burpee trustee under decedent's will, John A. Burpee appeals. Appeal dismissed, and decree affirmed.
Argued before WHITEHOUSE, C. J., and SAVAGE, SPEAR, KING, BIRD, and HALEY, JJ.
R. I. Thompson, of Rockland, for appellant.
E. B. Burpee, of Rockland, for appellees.
This is an appeal from a decree of the judge of probate of Knox county, appointing the appellee Samuel A. Burpee trustee under the will of his father, Samuel H. Burpee, who died testate in May, 1906, leaving six children, four sons and two daughters. The second and fifth items of the will are as follows:
"Fifth—I hereby nominate and appoint my sons, Samuel A. Burpee, Charles E. Burpee, Richard H. Burpee and John A. Burpee, executors of this will and hereby direct that no bond be required of them, nor shall they be required to return inventory or settle account in either capacity as executors or as trustees."
It appears that the estate consisted of 120 shares of the capital stock of the N. A. & S. H. Burpee Furniture Company, and an undivided half of a brick block on Main street in Rockland; and it was claimed in behalf of the appellee, and there was evidence tending to show, that the business of the Furniture Company was so thoroughly organized, and systematically conducted, by an experienced and competent manager, that ordinarily the only service required of the trustee, in practically discharging the trust after the death of the testator, was to collect the income and disburse it according to the terms of the will.
The four sons named in the will as executors and trustees never qualified as trustees by giving bonds as required by statute, and their nomination as trustees was never confirmed by the judge of probate. But, during the four years succeeding the death of the testator, the affairs of the estate appear to have been managed by the appellee Samuel A. Burpee, with the acquiescence of his co-executors, except that in March, 1907, a power of attorney was given to the appellant by the executors to collect and distribute the income of the estate; but this was surrendered by the appellant not long thereafter, upon complaint of the coexecutors that he had exceeded his authority thereunder and abused his trust.
Soon after the withdrawal of this power of attorney, the appellant and his bro...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Appeal of Garland
...done in Smith v. Chaney, supra. But in Merrill Trust Co. v. Hartford, 104 Me. 566, 72 A. 745, 129 Am. St. Rep. 415, and in Burpee v. Burpee, 109 Me. 379, 84 A. 648, the court again in unequivocal language stated the "It is a well settled and familiar rule in this state on such appeals that ......