Burroughs v. State, 5 Div. 853.
Citation | 24 Ala.App. 579,139 So. 115 |
Decision Date | 12 January 1932 |
Docket Number | 5 Div. 853. |
Parties | BURROUGHS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; S. L. Brewer, Judge.
W. E. Burroughs was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
H. T. Burns, of Wedowee, for appellant.
Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
The evidence in this record has been read and considered en banc. We have been unable to find any evidence which would warrant a verdict connecting this defendant with the criminal possession of the whisky found on his premises.
As has been pointed out many times by this court, a constructive possession alone is not sufficient to justify a conviction. There must, in addition to such possession, be a guilty scienter.
In line with numerous decisions of this court, we hold that the defendant was entitled to the general charge.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Snodgrass v. State
...198 So. 869 29 Ala.App. 564 SNODGRASS v. STATE. 8 Div. 14.Court of Appeals of AlabamaNovember 26, 1940 ... Appeal ... the offense charged. Burroughs v. State, 24 Ala.App ... 579, 139 So. 115; Pate v. State, 26 Ala.App ... ...
- Harper v. State, 6 Div. 94.