Burroughs v. State, 5 Div. 853.

Citation24 Ala.App. 579,139 So. 115
Decision Date12 January 1932
Docket Number5 Div. 853.
PartiesBURROUGHS v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; S. L. Brewer, Judge.

W. E. Burroughs was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

H. T. Burns, of Wedowee, for appellant.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence in this record has been read and considered en banc. We have been unable to find any evidence which would warrant a verdict connecting this defendant with the criminal possession of the whisky found on his premises.

As has been pointed out many times by this court, a constructive possession alone is not sufficient to justify a conviction. There must, in addition to such possession, be a guilty scienter.

In line with numerous decisions of this court, we hold that the defendant was entitled to the general charge.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Snodgrass v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 26 Noviembre 1940
    ...198 So. 869 29 Ala.App. 564 SNODGRASS v. STATE. 8 Div. 14.Court of Appeals of AlabamaNovember 26, 1940 ... Appeal ... the offense charged. Burroughs v. State, 24 Ala.App ... 579, 139 So. 115; Pate v. State, 26 Ala.App ... ...
  • Harper v. State, 6 Div. 94.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 12 Enero 1932

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT