Burt v. Titlow
| Docket Number | 12-414 |
| Decision Date | 05 November 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1915 cases
-
Dickey v. Davis
...presumed to result in prejudice."). A lawyer's violation of ethical norms does not make the lawyer per se ineffective. Burt v. Titlow, 571 U.S. 12, 18 (2013). b. State Court Direct and Collateral Review Petitioner presented claim II and all its subclaims in the second state exhaustion petit......
-
Flowers v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., Case No. 3:16-cv-539-J-39JRK
...comprehended in existing law beyond any possibility for fair-minded disagreement, there is no entitlement to habeas relief. Burt v. Titlow, 571 U.S. 12, 19-20 (2013). In undertaking its review, this Court is not obliged "to flyspeck the state court order or grade it." Meders, 911 F.3d at 13......
-
Cremeans v. Warden
...a State's criminal justice system has experienced the 'extreme malfunction' for which federal habeas relief is the remedy." Burt v. Titlow, 571 U.S. 12, 20 (2013) (quoting Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 102 (2011)); see also Renico v. Lett, 559 U.S. 766, 773 (2010) ("AEDPA . . . impose......
-
Pouncy v. Macauley
...is not entirely unfettered." Id. (The Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit's decision in Titlow, see Burt v. Titlow , 571 U.S. 12, 134 S.Ct. 10, 187 L.Ed.2d 348 (2013), but the Supreme Court did not address the Sixth Circuit's discussion of the remedy issue. Instead, the Supreme Court h......
Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
-
Systemic Barriers to Effective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Bargaining
...standard of review of ineffective assistance of counsel claims to be afforded state court decisions by federal judges. Burt v. Titlow, 134 S. Ct. 10, 13 (2013). 13. See Premo v. Moore, 131 S. Ct. 733, 739–42 (2011). 14 . Padilla , 559 U.S. at 372. 15. For two of a host of articles decrying ......
-
America's Written Constitution: Remembering the Judicial Duty to say what the Law is
...that never existed before and that have no connection to the definition of general jurisdiction). 96 134 S. Ct. 1115, 1121 (2014). 97 134 S. Ct. 10, 15–16 (2013) (citing Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214). C.f. Lopez v. Smith No. 13–9......
-
SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS AS PRECEDENT.
...a formidable barrier to federal habeas relief for prisoners whose claims have been adjudicated in state court.'" (quoting Burt v. Titlow, 571 U.S. 12, 19(2013))). (114.) Mullenix v. Luna, 136 S. Ct. 305, 308 (2015) (per curiam) (quoting Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 742(2011)). (115.) ......
-
Forgetting Furman
...a heavy measure of deference to counsel’s judgments” (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)). 269. See Burt v. Titlow, 134 S. Ct. 10, 13 (2013) (“When a state prisoner asks a federal court to set aside a sentence due to ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargainin......
Get Started for Free