Bushnell v. Crooke Mining Smelting Co
| Decision Date | 30 October 1893 |
| Docket Number | No. 195,195 |
| Citation | 150 U.S. 82,14 S.Ct. 22,37 L.Ed. 1007 |
| Parties | BUSHNELL et al. v. CROOKE MINING & SMELTING CO |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
A. R. Bushnell, for the motion.
We should not have been called on to reiterate the rule that an application for a rehearing cannot be entertained when presented after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was rendered. Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch, 1; Browder v. McArthur, 7 Wheat. 58; Sibald v. U. S., 12 Pet. 488; Brooks v. Railroad Co., 102 U. S. 107; Williams v. Conger, 131 U. S. 390 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 793. Application denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
Glass Co v. Co
...830, 27 L.Ed. 601; Hickman v. Fort Scott, supra, 141 U.S. at page 419, 12 S.Ct. at page 10, 35 L.Ed. 775; Bushnell v. Crooke Mining Co., 150 U.S. 82, 14 S.Ct. 22, 37 L.Ed. 1007. 7 Ex parte National Park Bank, 256 U.S. 131, 41 S.Ct. 403, 65 L.Ed. 863. 'That court was powerless to modify the ......
-
Omaha Elec. Light & Power Co. v. City of Omaha
... ... 80; Public Schools v. Walker, 9 Wall ... 603, 19 L.Ed. 650; Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting ... Co., 150 U.S. 82, 14 Sup.Ct. 2, 37 L.Ed ... ...
-
Tibbals v. Graham
... ... C. L. 85-89. The receiver is not a ... privy of Federal Gold Mining Company, Midwest Mines ... Corporation or any lien creditor. 25 R. C. L ... ...
-
Watson v. Gallagher
...said motion be and is overruled. Ex parte National Park Bank, 256 U.S. 131, 41 S.Ct. 403, 65 L.Ed. 863; Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting Co., 150 U.S. 82, 14 S.Ct. 22, 37 L.Ed. 1007; Fairmont Creamery Co. v. State of Minnesota, 275 U.S. 70, 72, 48 S.Ct. 97, 72 L.Ed. 168; Jourolman v. Ea......
Request a trial to view additional results