Butcher v. Butler

Decision Date07 December 1908
PartiesBUTCHER et al. v. BUTLER et al.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Bates County; Chas. A. Denton, Judge.

Action by Win Butcher and another against William J. Butler, as receiver of the Bates National Bank, and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Reversed.

John A. Eaton, E. H. McVey, and W. O. Jackson, for appellants. Thos. J. Smith and Silvers & Silvers, for respondents.

JOHNSON, J.

Action in equity to obtain a preference over the general creditors of the insolvent estate of the Bates National Bank. Plaintiff prevailed in the trial court, and the cause is here on the appeal of defendants.

June 25, 1906, L. C. Martin and plaintiff B. T. Becker of Nevada, Mo., entered into a written contract with plaintiff William Butcher of Mound City, Kan., by the terms of which Butcher was to drill a certain well for Martin and Becker near Butler, Mo. To secure the payment to Butcher of the agreed consideration for his performance of the contract, it was agreed in that instrument: "Said first party (meaning Becker) agrees to deposit one thousand dollars in the Bates National Bank at Butler, Mo., as a guarantee of its part for the use of said second party (Butcher) for such drilling, * * * payment to be made to said second party as follows: Each well to be paid for when it is completed and capped or when drilling is stopped." The contract was deposited by the parties with the cashier of the Bates National Bank on the date of its execution, and at the same time Becker deposited two checks, one for $1,000, drawn by him on a Wisconsin bank, and the other for $500, drawn on a bank in Nevada. A general account was opened by the bank with Becker in which the amounts of these checks were treated as so much money placed to the credit of the depositor. In due time the checks were collected by the bank. Afterward Becker was charged in this account with the following item: "Trust fund, June 29, $1,000.00." The cashier testified concerning this item that on discovering that Mr. Becker, if he chose, might exhaust the account by checking against it, since it was a general account, Mr. Butcher demanded that the said sum of $1,000 be placed by Becker in the bank in a way that would not subject it to the payment of his individual checks, and to this end caused Becker to write the following letter to the bank: "Butler, Mo., June 29, 1906. The Bates National Bank, Butler, Mo.—Gentlemen: You will please reserve $1,000.00 of my account until the test well I am about to have drilled in or near Butler is down 1,000 feet unless gas be found at a less depth after completion of the well, or when it will have been drilled to a depth of 1,000 feet. Mr. Win Butcher is to be paid in full his account against myself and L. C. Martin." Acting on the instructions contained in this letter, the cashier made out and handed to the bookkeeper a deposit slip as follows: "Trust fund by T. B. Becker * * * checks as follows: $1,000.00. To be paid to Butcher when he shall have put his drill down 1,000 feet. $1,000."

We quote from the testimony of the cashier relative to this account.

Direct examination: "Q. That memorandum was for the information of your bookkeeper? A. Yes, sir; or any body else that might—Q. It never was given to any body else, just kept in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
80 cases
  • State ex Inf. Taylor v. Currency Services, Inc., 40563.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 14, 1949
    ... ... State ex rel. Buder v. Compton, 271 S.W. 770; State v. Reid, 125 Mo. 43, 228 S.W. 172; Wedesweiler v. Brundage, 130 N.E. 520, 297 Ill. 228; Butcher v. Butler, 134 Mo. App. 61; Smith v. Kansas City, Kansas City Title & Trust Co., 255 U.S. 180; Warren v. Shook, 91 U.S. 704; Wells Fargo Co. v ... ...
  • Brown v. Maguire's Real Estate Agency, 35384.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 19, 1938
    ...Harrison, 228 Mo. App. 872, 74 S.W. (2d) 69; Mo. Mut. Assn., v. Holland Banking Co., 220 Mo. App. 1256, 290 S.W. 100; Butcher v. Butler, 134 Mo. App. 61, 114 S.W. 564; In re North Mo. Trust Co., 39 S.W. (2d) 415; Mo. Utilities Co. v. Scott County Bank, 62 S.W. (2d) 933; Greene County B. & L......
  • State, on Inf. of Taylor, v. Currency Services
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 14, 1949
    ... ... Compton, 271 S.W. 770; State v. Reid, ... 125 Mo. 43, 228 S.W. 172; Wedesweiler v. Brundage, ... 130 N.E. 520, 297 Ill. 228; Butcher v. Butler, 134 ... Mo.App. 61; Smith v. Kansas City, Kansas City Title & Trust Co., 255 U.S. 180; Warren v. Shook, 91 ... U.S. 704; Wells ... ...
  • Lucas v. Central Missouri Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 5, 1942
    ... ... and the bank , and one where the relation of debtor ... and creditor is created. [See Butcher et al. v. Butler et ... al., 134 Mo.App. 61, 114 S.W. 564; In re Olson's ... Estate, 206 Iowa 706, 219 N.W. 401; City of Canby v ... Bank of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT