Butler v. McNeal

CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtSMITH, Presiding.
CitationButler v. McNeal, 555 S.E.2d 525, 252 Ga. App. 68 (Ga. App. 2001)
Decision Date17 October 2001
Docket NumberNo. A01A1327.,A01A1327.
PartiesBUTLER v. McNEAL.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Anthony T. Pete, for appellant.

McLeod, Benton, Begnaud & Marshall, Malcolm C. McArthur, Athens, for appellee.

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

This appeal arises out of the trial court's order granting summary judgment to Lisa McNeal, a teacher, in an action for personal injuries filed by a student, Jonathan Butler.1 The trial court concluded that McNeal was entitled to official immunity because no evidence of actual malice was presented.2 We agree, and we affirm.

On the date of the incident at issue, Butler was a student at Hilsman Middle School in Athens. He was in his homeroom class, which was adjacent to a class taught by McNeal. Butler's class, under the supervision of a substitute teacher, became noisy and disruptive, and McNeal entered through a connecting door to help the teacher control the classroom. Butler, who had a history of disciplinary problems at the school, was separated from the other students and was seated at a table near this door. He acknowledged during his deposition that this seating arrangement was designed to "keep me out of trouble." The facts are somewhat in dispute as to the events that occurred after McNeal entered the classroom.

McNeal testified during her deposition that when she arrived, Butler was banging his chair against the wall. She asked him to stop, and he did so, but he began making comments such as, "Why do you teachers have to come over here?" and "Why are you getting in the business?" When Butler did not obey her instruction to stop making these comments, she told him to go to her classroom. He did not go, and she placed her hand on his back, on the shoulder area in order to get his attention, and said, "Come on, now let's go." She also placed her hand on the back of his chair, and she testified that while doing so, she heard a disturbance in her own classroom and leaned back to look through the connecting door. She felt the chair get "lighter" and turned around to see Butler on the floor, which was carpeted, "and then he jumped up." McNeal testified that she did not intentionally pull the chair but assumed that it moved when he stood up. He did not seem injured.3 McNeal instructed him to go into her classroom; she wanted him to have an opportunity to "cool down." He did so, but before she could return, he left the classroom, and she found him in the office. She then took him to the assistant principal's office, where he was assigned to in-school suspension.

Butler denied being disruptive or banging his chair into the wall. He stated that McNeal came to his chair and told him to be quiet and that she could hear him talking. He also testified that she poked him in the shoulder area, but he "was not really thinking about" whether this hurt. According to Butler, he told McNeal that he was not talking, and she told him to get up and go into her classroom. He reached forward to get his notebook and pushed his chair backward approximately two feet, and the next thing he knew, he was on the floor. Although he testified that it "felt like she just snatched the chair" and that she could not have been looking into her classroom when the incident occurred, he acknowledged that he was not looking at McNeal at the time and that he did not know if she pulled the chair on purpose or if the incident was an accident. He thought she purposefully pulled the chair because she did not apologize to him or ask him whether he was hurt. Butler stated that he heard McNeal "giggling or something" and saying "thank you" to the other teacher. He went into her classroom for a few minutes but then left to go to the office and call his mother. Before he could use the phone, however, McNeal arrived, and he testified that she took him by the arm to the assistant principal's office.

Butler argues that the trial court erroneously granted summary judgment to McNeal on the ground that disputed issues of fact exist as to how the incident happened and the extent of his injuries. Indeed, the accounts of the incident by McNeal and Butler...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Reece v. Turner
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 19 Marzo 2007
    ...immunity unless she can show that appellants were exercising ministerial rather than discretionary duties. See Butler v. McNeal, 252 Ga.App. 68, 70, 555 S.E.2d 525 (2001); Shuman v. Dyess, 175 Ga.App. 213, 215(2), 333 S.E.2d 379 (1985). [A] ministerial act is commonly one that is simple, ab......
  • Aliffi v. Liberty County School Dist.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 6 Febrero 2003
    ...discretionary acts. (Punctuation and footnotes omitted; emphasis supplied.) Id. at 824, 561 S.E.2d 837. See also Butler v. McNeal, 252 Ga.App. 68, 70, 555 S.E.2d 525 (2001). Similarly, in Kelly v. Lewis, 221 Ga.App. 506, 471 S.E.2d 583 (1996), this court determined that a teacher was immune......
  • Peterson v. Baker
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 25 Octubre 2007
    ...injure the plaintiff student, notwithstanding evidence that the defendant teacher acted with ill will); see also Butler v. McNeal, 252 Ga.App. 68, 555 S.E.2d 525, 526-27 (2001) (concluding that the record lacked evidence showing that the defendant teacher acted with actual malice or that sh......
  • Llewelyn v. Bryant
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 7 Marzo 2019
    ...506, 508, 471 S.E.2d 583 (1996). Such a determination may be made by the court on summary judgment. See, e.g., Butler v. McNeal , 252 Ga. App. 68, 70, 555 S.E.2d 525 (2001)."Where there is an established policy requiring an official to take specified action in a specified situation, the pol......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Local Government Law - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 54-1, September 2002
    • Invalid date
    ...were discretionary, and the trial court properly granted their motion for summary judgment." Id at 118-19, 561 S.E.2d at 244. 348. 252 Ga. App. 68, 555 S.E.2d 525 (2001). 349. Id. at 68-69, 555 S.E.2d at 526. 350. In the context of the teacher attempting to remove the student from the class......
  • "official Immunity" in Local Government Law: a Quantifiable Confrontation
    • United States
    • Georgia State University College of Law Georgia State Law Reviews No. 22-3, March 2006
    • Invalid date
    ...rejecting plaintiffs contention of ministerial functions. Id. at 853. The court noted that there had been no finding of malice. Id. 159. 555 S.E.2d 525 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). There, plaintiff alleged physical injury from a classroom discipline episode in which, he believed, the defendant teac......