Butler v. Steckel

Decision Date03 November 1890
Citation11 S.Ct. 25,137 U.S. 21,34 L.Ed. 582
PartiesBUTLER et al. v. STECKEL et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Joseph R. Edson and Lysander Hill, for appellants.

E. Banning and T. A. Banning, for appellees.

BLATCHFORD, J.

This is a suit in equity, brought in the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois, March 28, 1883, by Theodore H. Butler, George W. Earhart, and William M. Crawford, against George Steckel and Frederick Steckel, to recover for the infringement of letters patent No. 274,264, granted to the plaintiffs March 20, 1883, on an application filed July 6, 1882, for an 'improvement in bretzel cutters.' The specification, claims, and drawings of the patent are as follows: 'This invention relates to an improvement in moulds or dies for stamping or cutting out bretzels, having for its object more especially to cause the product or bretzel to have the appearance of a hand-made bretzel; and it consists in the peculiar construction of the mould or die to effect this result, and other details of construction, substantially as hereinafter more fully set forth. In the accompanying drawings, figure 1 is a plan view of our improved bretzel die or mould. Fig. 2 is a side view, partly broken away, thereof. Fig. 3 is an enlarged detailed plan view of the die proper. Figs. 4 and 5 are sectional views, taken respectively on the lines x, x, and y, y, of Fig. 3. Fig. 6 is

a view of the product or bretzel of our die. In carrying out our invention, we construct the die, A, after the fashion or configuration of the ordinary bretzel in its general shape,—that is, as more clearly shown in Fig. 3. For the purpose of this specification, we will describe the channel or groove constituting the bretzel die as consisting of a bow or an approximately heart-shaped portion, a, with its meeting portions, a1, extended so as to cross each other, as at a2. The underlapped portion is further extended, as at a3, said extension crossing or overlapping an extension, a4, of the previously overlapped portion, a2. The extensions, a3, a4, are projected into the body of the bow, a. At a2 the creaser of one arm of the groove or channel is extended, as at a5, across its other arm, and united to a3, while the creaser a3 is extended on one side, as at a6, across a2. The ends of a3, a4 project into the bow, a, and terminate in creasers a7. This construction enables the creasing of the product or bretzel at the points above detailed, which imparts to the die-made bretzel the appearance of having been made by hand, or a natural appearance. The die, A, may be used, as shown, in connection with means to permit its manipulation by hand, which consists of a base, B, through which it is adapted to move or operate, the guides or uprights, C, the top plate, D, and the sliding hand piece, E. The uprights or guides, C, are fixed to the base, B, and to the plate, D. Around the plate, D, and the guides slides the hand piece, E, cushioned preferably upon helical springs, b, secured upon the base, B. F, F, are the expelling studs, secured to the top plate, D, and to the base, B, below which they extend a short distance, and through coincident appertures distributed through the die, A. The die is fixed to the vertically sliding box or hand piece, E. When the hand piece, E, is pressed downward, the operation of cutting or stamping out the bretzel from the dough will be performed. Upon the rising of the die, effected automatically by the spring, the studs, whose lower ends, as above stated, project a short distance below the die in its elevated position, will expel the plastic bretzel from the die, should it have a tendency to adhere or stick to it. The die can also be readily applied as well to a cylindrical surface as to other surfaces, and used in any number desired. Cams or other suitable devices may be employed in lieu of the hand for operating the dies. We are aware that the form of the creasers can be changed without departing from the principle of our inven- tion. The product of the die herein shown is not herein claimed, as it will be made the subject-matter of a subsequent application. The cutter herein shown is adapted, by means of the feet or projection, b', on the base, B, to be moved upon a flat surface and over the dough, and to cut from the same bretzels, which, being left upon a flat surface after cutting are not so liable to become misshaped as when cut by rotary cutters, as heretofore; and by the additional creasers, a5, a5, and the novel creasers, a7, a7, perfect semblance to a hand-made twisted bretzel is produced, while the creaser heretofore used, as a6, does not produce the desired result. Each die has three off-bearing scrap passages, a3, which pick up the internal scraps, and deliver them into the box or hand-piece, E. It will be observed that our dies form two kinds of scrap, to-wit, connected scraps and internal scraps, the latter being picked up by the dies, and, after passing through the channels, a3, are delivered into the box, E, or other suitable receiver. We are aware that it is not new to cut lozenges by means of a plate having a series of tubes which cut the lozenges, leaving a connected scrap, the lozenges being carried upward in the tubes; also that it is old to cut bretzels by means of dies which at once deliver the internal scraps, as they are cut, into one of the cylinders which carry the dies. Having thus fully described our invention, we claim and desire to secure by letters-patent: (1) A flat die for cutting bretzels, having the bow, a, the loops, a', a', the intermediate twisted portion, and the ends, a3, a4, and provided with the central creaser, a6, the side creasers, a5, a5, and the end creasers, a7, a7, projecting into the bow, a, substantially as shown and described. (2) In a bretzel cutter, the combination of the die, A, perforated, as described, for the reception and passage of the scraps, and for the expelling studs, F, with said studs, the guiderods, C, the base, B, provided with feet or projections, b', the springs, b, perforated plate, D, and the hand piece, E, substantially as shown and described. (3) A flat bretzel-shaped die, having three...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Handel Co. v. Jefferson Glass Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • May 1, 1920
    ... ... Cincinnati Ry ... Co., 132 U.S. 161, 10 Sup.Ct. 45, 33 L.Ed. 295; ... Marchand v. Emkem, 132 U.S. 195, 10 Sup.Ct. 65, 33 ... L.Ed. 332; Butler v. Steckel, 137 U.S. 21, 11 ... Sup.Ct. 25, 34 L.Ed. 582; Ansonia Co. v. Electrical ... Supply Co., 144 U.S. 11, 12 Sup.Ct. 601, 36 L.Ed. 327; ... ...
  • Positive Lock Washer Co. v. Reliance Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Ohio
    • June 14, 1913
    ... ... dies and shaping them to conform with the finished Turnbull ... washer. This did not constitute invention. Butler v ... Steckel, 137 U.S. 21, 11 Sup.Ct. 25, 34 L.Ed. 582; ... Smith v. Nichols, 88 U.S. 112, 119, 22 L.Ed. 566; ... Dunbar v. Myers, 94 U.S. 187, ... ...
  • Revies v. Loyd, Civ. A. No. 8194.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana
    • May 18, 1962
  • Potts v. Creager
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • January 3, 1891
    ... ... may be found in very recent decisions by the supreme court of ... the United States. See Butler v. Steckel, 53 O.G ... 1090, 11 S.Ct. 25. That case was upon a patent for an ... improvement in bretzel cutters, being an improvement in ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT