Byrd v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Dept.
| Decision Date | 06 October 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 07-16640.,07-16640. |
| Parties | Charles Edward BYRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; Joseph M. Arpaio; Kathleen O'Connell; Austin Peterson; Durango Jail, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Eileen Dennis Gilbride, Esquire, Jones Skelton & Hochuli, PLC, Maria R. Brandon, Esquire, Dennis Dale Carpenter, Jr., Esquire, Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Division of County Counsel, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants-Appellees.
Prior report: 565 F.3d 1205.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Brown v. Short
...limited.' " Mot. to Dismiss at 11 (quoting Byrd v. Maricopa Sheriff's Dep't, 565 F.3d 1205, 1222 (9th Cir.), reh'g granted, 583 F.3d 673 (9th Cir.2009)). Further, it is well-established that the Fourth Amendment does not require employing the least intrusive means possible. Bd. of Educ. of ......
-
Byrd v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Dept.
...(9th Cir.2009), a divided panel of this court affirmed the district court's judgment. We subsequently granted rehearing en banc, 583 F.3d 673 (9th Cir.2009). II. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review an order granting or denying judgment as a matter of law de novo. See Mangum v. Action Collection Se......
- United States v. Lopez, 12–50464.
- United States v. Lopez