Byron Weston Co. v. United States, 49060.

Decision Date03 January 1950
Docket NumberNo. 49060.,49060.
PartiesBYRON WESTON CO. v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Claims Court

Horace S. Whitman, Washington, D. C., for the plaintiff. Hugh C. Bickford, Washington, D. C. was on the brief.

John W. Hussey, Washington, D. C., with whom was Assistant Attorney General Theron L. Caudle, for the defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and WHITAKER, HOWELL, MADDEN, and LITTLETON, Judges.

WHITAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff in its petition alleges that it sustained a loss of $40,351.51 for the calendar year 1942. When it filed its income tax return for 1943 it claimed this loss as a deduction from its 1943 income. Under the statute this loss was deductible first from its 1941 income, and only the excess of the loss over the 1941 income was deductible from 1943 income. There was no excess.

Section 122 of the Internal Revenue Code, which was added by the Revenue Act of 1939, c. 247, 53 Stat. 862, 867, section 211 (b), 26 U.S.C.A. § 122(b) (1, 2), provides:

"* * * (b) as amended by the Revenue Act of 1942, c. 619, 56 Stat. 798, 847, Sec. 153(a) Amount of carry-back and carry-over.

"(1) Net operating loss carry-back. If for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1941, the taxpayer has a net operating loss, such net operating loss shall be a net operating loss carry-back for each of the two preceding taxable years, except that the carry-back in the case of the first preceding taxable year shall be the excess, if any, of the amount of such net operating loss over the net income for the second preceding taxable year computed (A) with the exceptions, additions, and limitations provided in subsection (d) (1), (2), (4), and (6), and (B) by determining the net operating loss deduction for such second preceding taxable year without regard to such net operating loss.

"(2) Net operating loss carry-over. If for any taxable year the taxpayer has a net operating loss, such net operating loss shall be a net operating loss carry-over for each of the two succeeding taxable years, except that the carry-over in the case of the second succeeding taxable year shall be the excess, if any, of the amount of such net operating loss over the net income for the intervening taxable year computed (A) with the exceptions, additions, and limitations provided in subsection (d) (1), (2), (4), and (6), and (B) by determining the net operating loss deduction for such intervening taxable year without regard to such net operating loss and without regard to any net operating loss carry-back. For the purposes of the preceding sentence the net operating loss for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1941 shall be reduced by the sum of the net income for each of the two preceding taxable years (computed for each such preceding taxable year with the exceptions, additions, and limitations provided in subsection (d) (1), (2), (4), and (6), and computed by determining the net operating loss deduction without regard to such net operating loss or to the net operating loss for the succeeding taxable year). * * *"

When plaintiff's 1943 return was audited the Internal Revenue agent advised plaintiff that this loss was not deductible from 1943 income but from 1941 income. However, the agent advised plaintiff that the date for filing claim for refund for 1941 taxes had already expired. Thereafter, on February 26, 1947, after the statute had run, plaintiff filed a claim for refund of 1941 taxes. It claimed it had a right to do this since its claim for the loss against 1943 income should be treated as an informal claim for refund of 1941 taxes. The Commissioner rejected the claim and this suit was brought.

Plaintiff's effort to deduct this loss from its 1943 income certainly was not a claim for refund of 1941 taxes. The only claim for refund of 1941 taxes was filed after the expiration of the statutory period, and section 322 (b) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 322 (b) (1) says:

"Unless a claim for credit or refund is filed by the taxpayer within three years from the time the return was filed by the taxpayer or within two years from the time...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • American Radiator & Standard San. Corp. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • August 29, 1963
    ...has been filed for another year or by a different taxpayer. Rosengarten v. United States, supra; Byron Weston Co. v. United States, 87 F.Supp. 955, 956-957, 115 Ct.Cl. 232, 234-235 (1950). On the other hand, the writing should not be given a crabbed or literal reading, ignoring all the surr......
  • Kuehn v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • September 25, 1973
    ...have notice, sufficient to focus his attention on the merits of the plaintiff's claim. The facts involved in Byron Weston Co. v. United States, 87 F.Supp. 955, 115 Ct.Cl. 232 (1950), appear to come closest to those now before the court. The taxpayer there suffered a $40,000 loss in 1942, th......
  • Young v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas
    • February 28, 1952
    ...presentation of such a claim and, therefore, could not be considered by the Commissioner or by this court. See, Byron Weston Co. v. United States, 87 F.Supp. 955, 115 Ct.Cl. 232, where the Court of Claims reached the same result in a similar Conclusions of Law. 1. The Court has jurisdiction......
  • Alcea Band of Tillamooks v. United States, 45230.
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • January 3, 1950
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT