C-E Bldg. Products, Inc. v. Seal-Rite Aluminum Products of N. H., Inc.

Decision Date28 February 1974
Docket NumberSEAL-RITE,No. 6795,C-E,6795
Citation316 A.2d 198,114 N.H. 150
PartiesBUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. v.ALUMINUM PRODUCTS OF N.H., INC., and Michael J. Donovan.
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court

Victor W. Dahar, Manchester, by brief and orally, for plaintiff.

Gerald Cabitt, trustee in bankruptcy for defendant Seal-Rite Aluminum Products of N.H., Inc., pro se, by brief and orally.

Hanrahan & Flynn and John C. Emery, Manchester, for defendant Michael J. Donovan.

GRIFFITH, Justice.

This action by the plaintiff to recover for goods sold and delivered to defendant Seal-Rite Aluminum Products of N.H., Inc., was brought against Seal-Rite and Michael J. Donovan as guarantor by writ returnable in March 1972. Initially the same counsel appeared for both defendants but on July 7, 1972, Seal-Rite filed in bankruptcy and on August 28, 1972, counsel withdrew their appearance for the corporate defendant. Attorney Cabitt was appointed trustee in bankruptcy of the corporate defendant and on September 11, 1972, filed his appearance as trustee in bankruptcy for Seal-Rite. On October 13, 1972, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment against Seal-Rite giving notice to the trustee in bankruptcy but none to counsel for Donovan. The trustee in bankruptcy concluded there was no defense by Seal-Rite to the action and with the permission of the referee in bankruptcy permitted summary judgment against the corporate defendant in the amount of $69,729.21 on November 7, 1972.

On November 20, 1972, counsel for Donovan filed a motion to set the judgment aside which was granted January 15, 1973, by the Trial Court (Perkins, J.) who reserved and transferred plaintiff's exception.

In the present posture of the case the issue of whether Donovan was entitled to notice of the motion for summary judgment is immaterial. The question now is whether Donovan was entitled to prevent judgment being entered against Seal-Rite which Seal-Rite's trustee in bankruptcy did not oppose. If Donovan as surety is prejudiced by the judgment against his principal then the trial court ruling setting the summary judgment aside should be sustained. However, we find no possible prejudice to defendant Donovan and accordingly sustain plaintiff's exception.

It is not alleged in this case that Donovan agreed to pay any judgment that might be recovered against the principal (see Judge of Probate v. Sulloway, 68 N.H. 511, 44 A. 720 (1896)) but rather that he guaranteed the payment for goods supplied the corporate defendant. While there is some apparent authority to the contrary (see 72 C.J.S. Principal & Surety § 261 (1951); 50 Am.Jur. Suretyship § 200 (1970); Annot., 59 A.L.R.2d 752 (1938), logic and justice...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. v. Peerless Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 13, 1981
    ...380 (1979).a. Mass.App.Ct.Adv.Sh. (1979) 852.9 In support of its position, Peerless relies on C-E Bldg. Prods., Inc. v. Seal-Rite Aluminum Prods. of N.H., Inc., 114 N.H. 150, 316 A.2d 198 (1974). In that case, a supplier brought suit against a company for the value of goods it had supplied ......
  • Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Greenwich Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • October 6, 2003
    ...v. First Bank and Trust of Richardson, 540 S.W.2d 572, 574 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1976); CE Building Products, Inc. v. Seal-Rite Aluminum Products of N.H., 316 A.2d 198, 199, 114 N.H. 150 (1974); The Bomud Co. v. Yockey Oil Co., 180 Kan. 109, 299 P.2d 72, 76 (1956); Krekel v. Thomasma, 255 Mich......
  • Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet, 85-CA-2912-MR
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 1986
    ...a prior judgment against a principal: 1) was inadmissible evidence of facts litigated, C-E Building Products, Inc. v. Seal-Rite Aluminum Products of N.H., Inc., 114 N.H. 150, 316 A.2d 198, 199 (N.H.1974), see also 10 S. Williston, Contracts Sec. 1256 at 817 (3d ed. 1967); 2) was no evidence......
  • Rhode Island Hosp. Trust Nat. Bank v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 85-1876
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • April 25, 1986
    ...of Suretyship Sec. 1.5, at 4 (5th ed. 1951) (hereinafter Law of Suretyship ); see also C-E Building Products, Inc. v. Seal-Rite Aluminum Products of N.H., 114 N.H. 150, 316 A.2d 198, 198-99 (1974) (using terms interchangeably); Morris & Co. v. Lucker, 158 Mich. 518, 123 N.W. 21, 22 (1909). ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT