C.J.L.G. v. Sessions, 16-73801
| Decision Date | 19 September 2018 |
| Docket Number | No. 16-73801,16-73801 |
| Citation | 904 F.3d 642 (Mem) |
| Parties | C.J.L.G., a juvenile male, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Bennett did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
C.J.L.G. v. Barr
...A majority of active judges voted to grant CJ’s petition for rehearing en banc, and the panel opinion was vacated. C.J.L.G. v. Sessions , 904 F.3d 642, 642 (9th Cir. 2018).II. DiscussionA.An IJ is required to inform a petitioner subject to removal proceedings of "apparent eligibility to app......
-
J. E. F.M. v. Whitaker, s. 15-35738
...now pending rehearing before an en banc panel. See C.J.L.G. v. Sessions , 880 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2018), reh'g en banc granted , 904 F.3d 642 (9th Cir. 2018). The record in C.J.L.G. consists almost exclusively of documents from the child's individual removal proceedings. And, because the ch......
- Deaton Oil Co. v. United States