C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co. v. Hackbarth

Decision Date21 June 1921
Citation102 Or. 80,198 P. 908
PartiesC. R. SHAW WHOLESALE CO. v. HACKBARTH.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

In Banc.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Wallowa County; J. W. Knowles, Judge.

Action by C. R. Shaw Wholesale Company against A. Hackbarth, doing business as the Lapwai Lumber Company, for damages for breach of a contract. Judgment for plaintiff, after trial by the court without a jury, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Plaintiff brings this action for damages for breach of a contract. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The material facts alleged are as follows: Plaintiff is an Idaho corporation. Defendant, A. Hackbarth, is doing business as the Lapwai Lumber Company, in Wallowa county, Or. About April 4, 1917, the defendant--

"contracted and agreed with the plaintiff to sell plaintiff 250,000 feet 8/4 shop lumber, surfaced two sides, of grades No. 3 and better at the quoted and agreed price of $26 for No. 3, $32 for No. 2, and $40 for No. 1; delivery to be made by September 15, 1917, on freight rate of 52 cents."

The defendant neglected and refused to deliver any part of the lumber at any time. At the time agreed upon for the delivery of the lumber, and since, the market value thereof per 1,000 feet was as follows: $33.50 for No. 3; $40.50 for No. 2; and $50.50 for No. 1. Plaintiff was damaged in the sum of $2,000. A general demurrer was filed to the complaint, which, upon being overruled, defendant answered, admitting the corporate character of plaintiff, and the name in which defendant was doing business, and denied the other allegations of the complaint. For a further answer the defendant pleaded that no note or memorandum in writing expressing the consideration of the alleged contract was ever subscribed by the defendant that no part of the lumber alleged to have been contracted for was ever received or accepted by plaintiff, or paid for by plaintiff; and that the alleged contract is void within the statute of frauds. The reply put in issue the new matter of the answer. Upon the trial plaintiff sought to prove, over the objections and exceptions of counsel for defendant, the contract by the production of correspondence between the plaintiff and defendant, the gist of which, so far as material is as follows:

Plaintiff's Exhibit A.

"Enterprise Oregon, Mar. 21, 1917.

"C R. Shaw Wholesale Co., Boise, Ida.--Gentlemen: * * * I haven't any lumber to offer at the present time and regarding the shop lumber I would be willing to contract providing I got the price I am holding it for this on a 52¢ rate

5/4 and 6/4 #1, $38.00.

5/4 and 6/4 #2, $30.00.

5/4 and 6/4 #3, $26.00.

$2.00 more for 8/4 #1 and 2 S2S.

"I expect this will look rather high to you, but according to what we have to pay for manufacturing our material this is only a fair price, and will stay with these prices until I see that conditions changes and I prefer selling 8/4 as I have contracted several hundred thousand of the 5/4 and 6/4 to be shipped Aug. & Sept.

"Yours truly, Lapwai Lumber Co,"

Plaintiff's answer reads:

Plaintiff's Exhibit B.

"March 22d, 1917.

"Lapwai Lumber Co., Enterprise, Oregon--Gentlemen: Your favor of March 21st at hand regarding shop. We would be willing to take the shop lumber at the prices you quote, although you are above the market on No. 2. However we would take our chances on the No. 2. Now you let us know just how many thousand feet of each thickness 5/4, 6/4 and 8/4 you will let us have at the prices you name, and we will send you a blanket order for such amounts. In accepting such an order it would have to be definitely understood that you would furnish the full amounts of each thickness, because we will make contracts with our customers to furnish exactly those amounts, and we will have to depend upon you furnishing the stock you agreed to furnish.

"Just at this time there is an extreme scarcity of shop lumber especially No. 2, but we are inclined to think that as the mills come on the market with the new cut, prices will more likely decline, and we think that you are making a good trade by selling outright at the prices you are now making. However we want to keep in touch with you and get started by making this deal on the shop. A little later on, if you are willing, we would consider some kind of a proposition of a million feet of yard stock, common and finish. * * *

"Yours very truly,

"C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co."

The next letter reads thus:

Plaintiff's Exhibit C.

"Enterprise, Oregon, April 3, 1917.

"C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co., Boise, Idaho--Gentlemen: Your letter of the 22d received. I would be willing to let you have about 250 thousand 8/4 #3 and better shop at the prices I quoted you, but in case they should change the freight rates, different arrangements would have to be made at such time. This is not all the shop I will have, but it is all I want to contract at the present time.

"Yours truly,

"Lapwai Lumber Company,

"By A. Hackbarth."

Plaintiff then wrote defendant as follows:

Plaintiff's Exhibit D.

"April 4th, 1917.

"Lapwai Lumber Co., Enterprise, Oregon--Gentlemen: Your favor of the 3d at hand, and are inclosing order for the 250 M. ft. of 8/4 shop. This we expect to ship all to one customer, and will send you shipping instructions in ample time.

"The writer is planning a trip to Eastern Oregon and will undoubtedly see you the latter part of next week.

"Yours truly,

"C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co."

Mr. J. G. Doerr, an officer of the plaintiff company, testified in explanation of the order inclosed, thus:

"This is a substantial copy of that order. The original sheet of that order, of course, has printed matter on, which the duplicate copy does not have--does not carry. It shows who it is addressed to."

A copy of the order follows:

Plaintiff's Exhibit E.

"No. 5180.

"April 4th, 7.

"C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co.

"To follow by Sept. 15th, 52¢ rate, reg. 250,000 8/4 #3 shop and better S2S

#3 @ 26.00

#2 @ 32.00

#1 @ 40.00

"Lapwai Lumber Co., Enterprise, Oregon.

"As per your letters March 21st and April 3d."

In about a month and a half defendant wrote plaintiff this letter:

Plaintiff's Exhibit F.

"Enterprise, Oregon, May 16, 1917.

"C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co., Boise, Idaho--Gentlemen: I think I will have to raise the price on the shop mentioned, which was about 250,000 feet, on account of the war, as I have to raise my contractors about 1/3 and it is no more than right to do the same with you and if you have it contracted tell the other fellow the same as we were not figuring on war at that time.

"Yours truly, Lapwai Lumber Co.

"By A. Hackbarth."

Defendant also wrote a letter which reads thus:

Plaintiff's Exhibit G.

"Enterprise, Oregon, June 4, 1917.

"C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co., Boise, Ida.--Gentlemen: Your letter of the 29th received regarding the 2X12 at $14. I don't want any of it at that price as I can get considerable more money of course, I suppose you are figuring this on a shop deal but I want you to strictly understand that I am doing with you the same as I do with my contractors. I had a contract let for my logging, and also he was under bonds to furnish the logs, but I did not see that he could do it for the price he was getting after everything got as high as it is now, and looks as if it may go higher. I have raised my contractor 1/3 and all other expenses are nearly 1/2 so don't mention the shop any more as I will not furnish it at all unless it is down at that price whenever it is dry. Whenever it is dry I want the market price whether it is high or low and if it is too low I will not sell any and will not manufacture any more. I am willing for you to handle my stock but do not want to sell for any such price as you offered me for the 2-inch.

"Yours truly, Lapwai Lumber Co.

"By A. Hackbarth."

(We underscore the material part.)

Plaintiff wrote defendant thus:

Plaintiff's Exhibit H.

"October 13, 1917.

"Lapwai Lumber Co., Enterprise, Oregon--Gentlemen: Please ship as soon as possible to ourselves at Oshkosh, Wisconsin, the 250 M. ft. of 2"' shop on our order No. 5180 of April 4th. Please route shipments OWR&N OSL UP CM & STP., and advise about how fast our cars will go forward.

"Yours truly,

"C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co."

Plaintiff also wrote the following letter:

Plaintiff's Exhibit I.

"December 6th, 1917.

"Lapwai Lumber Co., Enterprise, Oregon--Gentlemen: Please let us know when you intend to ship the 2"' shop to Oshkosh on our order No. 5180 of April 4th, and oblige

"Yours truly,

"C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co."

Defendant offered in evidence the following letter:

Defendant's Exhibit 1.

"Enterprise, Oregon, Aug. 2, 1917.

"C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co., Boise, Ida--Gentlemen: Your letter of the 28th received regarding the C select. We do not want to sell this big amount to one person as I think we will run out of clears and cannot fill our yard orders. Regarding the shop lumber it seems to me that you are figuring on pretty low prices, but as you are always mentioning the 250,000 which you are figuring you would be entitled to, but as conditions have changed as I told you before I don't think you would be entitled to it, and in this way I will let you have 200,000 8/4 1, 2 and 3 shop at the price which you mentioned July 30th, allowing you $1 commission, but I must know within the next week as I am figuring on going East, and if you cannot handle it perhaps I can dispose of it on my trip.

"Yours truly, Lapwai Lumber Co.,

"By A. Hackbarth."

Plaintiff's counsel objected to this letter, as not pertaining to the transaction contained in the letters forming the contract which objection was sustained and exceptions...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • C. R. Shaw Wholesale Co. v. Hackbarth
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 22 d2 Novembro d2 1921
    ...J. W. Knowles, Judge. On rehearing. Original determination set aside, and judgment of the trial court reversed. For original opinion, see 198 P. 908. Thos. M. Dill, of Enterprise, for J. A. Burleigh, of Enterprise, for respondent. RAND, J. The main, and as we view it the only, question nece......
  • Breese v. Bramwell
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 15 d2 Novembro d2 1921

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT