Cabal v. State, 95-99
Decision Date | 28 June 1995 |
Docket Number | No. 95-99,95-99 |
Citation | 656 So.2d 290 |
Parties | 20 Fla. L. Weekly D1516 Jose CABAL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Keith S. Kromash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
We affirm based on the authority of Jennings v. State, 498 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We also certify conflict with Woods v. State, 654 So.2d 606 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), Archibald v. State, 646 So.2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), and Spicer v. State, 615 So.2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cabal v. State
...General and Keith S. Kromash, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for Respondent. OVERTON, Justice. We have for review Cabal v. State, 656 So.2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). In Cabal, the district court found that section 775.0845, Florida Statutes (1993), which imposes an enhanced penalty for we......
- Cabal v. State