Cable v. Gaty

Decision Date31 March 1864
CitationCable v. Gaty, 34 Mo. 573 (Mo. 1864)
PartiesISAAC C. CABLE et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. SAMUEL GATY et al., Defendants in Error.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Error to St. Louis Land Court.

This suit was brought against the Directors of the Marine Railway and Dock Company, upon the same case as was made out in the case of Cable et als. v. McCune et als., reported 26 Mo. 371.

C. D. Drake, for plaintiffs in error.

Gantt, Glover & Shepley, Sharp & Broadhead, for defendants in error.

BATES, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit to subject the defendants to personal liability as directors of the St. Louis Marine Railway and Dock Company, a corporation chartered in 1849, upon the allegation that the debts of the corporation exceeded the amount of stock paid in.

The plaintiffs' claim against the corporation is the same which is described in the case of Cable v. McCune, 26 Mo. 371, in which the same plaintiffs sought to subject the defendants to personal liability as stockholders; and the first question presented is whether the demand of the plaintiffs is a debt of the corporation within the meaning of the section of the act under which it is sought to hold the defendants liable.

The section is as follows: “The whole amount of the debts of any corporation hereafter created (except banking companies) shall not exceed the amount of its capital stock actually paid in, and in case of any excess the directors under whose administration it shall happen shall be jointly and severally liable, to the extent of such excess, for all the debts of the company then existing, and for all that shall be contracted, so long as they shall respectively continue in office, and until the debts shall be reduced to the said amount of the capital stock: provided, that any of the directors who shall be absent at the time of contracting any debt contrary to the foregoing provisions, or who shall...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • Jewell v. Nuhn
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1915
    ... ... corporation, and that, hence, the word as used in such ... statements does not cover such things as unliquidated claims ... for a tort. Cable v. McCune , 26 Mo. 371; Cable ... v. Gaty , 34 Mo. 573; Doolittle v. Marsh , (Neb.) ... 11 Neb. 243, 9 N.W. 54; Esmond v. Bullard , 16 Hun ... ...
  • Rogers v. Stag Mining Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 12, 1915
    ...of a different wording of the Massachusetts statute making it a remedial one. The Cable v. McCune case, supra, was followed in Cable v. Gaty, 34 Mo. 573, 86 Amer. Dec. construing in a similar manner a then statute of this State imposing on the directors of a corporation liability, with some......
  • State ex rel. Miller v. Shryack
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 10, 1904
    ... ... liable for bona fide debts of the corporation left unpaid at ... the time of its dissolution. R. S. 1889, sec. 2519; Cable ... v. McCune, 26 Mo. 371; Cable v. Gaty, 34 Mo ... 573. (3) A tax is not a debt nor in the nature of a debt ... Carondelet v. Picot, 38 ... ...
  • Jewell v. Nuhn
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1915
    ...such statements does not cover such things as unliquidated claims for a tort. Cable v. McCune, 26 Mo. 371, 72 Am. Dec. 214;Cable v. Gaty, 34 Mo. 573, 86 Am. Dec. 126; Doolittle's Case, 11 Neb. 243, 9 N. W. 54; Esmond's Case (N. Y.) 16 Hun, 65, 68. And as to municipal corporations, the word ......
  • Get Started for Free