Cade v. State, 5 Div. 79
| Decision Date | 13 May 1986 |
| Docket Number | 5 Div. 79 |
| Citation | Cade v. State, 491 So.2d 1075 (Ala. Crim. App. 1986) |
| Parties | Jonathan William CADE v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
J. Michael Williams, Sr., Auburn, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Beatrice E. Oliver, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Jonathan William Cade was accused of obtaining drugs by fraud, a violation of § 20-2-70, Code of Alabama 1975. Represented by counsel, he pleaded guilty in open court and admitted three prior felony convictions. He signed an affidavit regarding the prior convictions, adding that he was represented by counsel in each. On the basis of a plea-bargain agreement, the court nol-prossed another pending case against Cade and sentenced him to 50 years' imprisonment. Appellant now contends that his prior convictions were not sufficiently proven. When an accused admits prior felony convictions, they are deemed proven for purposes of § 13A-5-9, Code of Alabama 1975. Peoples v. State, 415 So.2d 1230 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Watson v. State, 439 So.2d 762 (Ala.Crim.App.1983). Cade's guilty plea was properly accepted insofar as the technicalities of guilty pleas are concerned.
Section 20-2-70, does not include a designation describing it as a class A, B, or C felony. Section 13A-5-4, Code of Alabama 1975, "Designation of Offenses," provides:
While punishment is specified in § 20-2-70, classification is not. We interpret § 13A-5-4 to apply to § 20-2-70 and find that violation of the latter code section constitutes a class C felony.
The Habitual Felony Offender Act provides "(c) In all cases when it is shown that a criminal defendant has been previously convicted of any three felonies and after such convictions has committed another felony, he must be punished as follows:
(1) On conviction of a class C felony, he must be punished by imprisonment for life or for any term not more than 99 years but not less than 15 years ..."
The legislature intended that all felonies be considered under the Habitual Felony Offender Act. Motley v. State, 409 So.2d 945 (Ala.Crim.App.1981).
The negotiated plea for 50 years was within the lawful range of sentences. We are without authority to review a sentence so long as the sentence imposed is within the limits prescribed by the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Smith v. State
...of the statute. See Reed v. State, 691 So.2d 463 (Ala.Cr.App.1996); Martin v. State, 687 So.2d 1253 (Ala.Cr.App.1996); Cade v. State, 491 So.2d 1075 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). We find no error IV. Smith contends that his conviction and sentence must be vacated because, he says, they were premised o......
-
Kelley v. State, 1 Div. 384
...(Ala.Cr.App.1986); German v. State, 500 So.2d 478 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); Tice v. State, 491 So.2d 1065 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); Cade v. State, 491 So.2d 1075 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). Furthermore, Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 103 S.Ct. 3001, 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983), is inapplicable to sentences of less than l......
-
Ex parte Chambers
...To the extent the following cases, and any others, are inconsistent with this holding, they are hereby overruled: Cade v. State, 491 So.2d 1075 (Ala.Crim.App.1986); Lott v. State, 471 So.2d 481 (Ala.Crim.App.1984); Files v. State, 468 So.2d 190 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), cert. denied, 468 So.2d 1......
-
Osborn v. State, CR-03-1992.
... ... See § 13A-5-9(c)(1), Ala.Code 1975. This appeal followed. 1 ... The ... ...