Cain v. Cain
| Decision Date | 12 January 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 10040,10040 |
| Citation | 546 S.W.2d 203 |
| Parties | Camille Ann CAIN, Appellant, v. John William CAIN, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Julian J. Ossman, Myers, Webster & Perry, Webb City, for appellant.
Niewald, Risjord & Waldeck, Jon Dermott, Blanchard, Van Fleet, Martin, Robertson & Dermott, Joplin, for respondent.
Before BILLINGS, C.J. and HOGAN and FLANIGAN, JJ.
In the trial court, Camille Ann Cain, appellant here, sought to collect, by execution and garnishment in aid thereof, delinquent amounts of child support and maintenance owed by her former husband John William Cain, respondent here. John filed a motion to quash the execution and the trial court sustained the motion and entered its order quashing the execution and the garnishment issued in aid thereof. Camille appeals from that order. The appeal lies. Hardin v. Hardin, 512 S.W.2d 851, 852(1) (Mo.App.1974).
The judgment must be reversed on the basis of principles enunciated in Bonadonna v. Bonadonna, 322 S.W.2d 925, 926(1--2) (Mo.1959), a case which is factually similar.
The sole ground of John's motion to quash was that the judgment had been paid. At the hearing on the motion no evidence was presented. The same situation prevailed in Bonadonna where the supreme court agreed with the ex-wife's contention that 'the trial court had no authority to quash the execution based upon the fact that the judgment had been paid without hearing evidence to substantiate said allegation.'
In Bonadonna at p. 926 the court said (authorities omitted):
See also Hedgecorth v. Hedgecorth, 463 S.W.2d 596, 598(6--10) (Mo.App.1971).
The order quashing the writ of execution (and setting aside the garnishment in aid thereof) is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cain v. Webster, 15585
...State Podiatry Examining Board, 275 Ark. 100, 628 S.W.2d 295 (1982); Cain v. Hershewe, 760 S.W.2d 146 (Mo.App.1988); Cain v. Cain, 546 S.W.2d 203 (Mo.App.1977); Cain v. Cain, 536 S.W.2d 866 The plaintiff's petition is in three counts. In the first count the plaintiff alleged the defendants ......
-
Cain v. Buehner and Buehner
...Board, 734 F.2d 377 (8th Cir.1984); Cain v. Arkansas State Podiatry Examining Board, 275 Ark. 100, 628 S.W.2d 295 (1982); Cain v. Cain, 546 S.W.2d 203 (Mo.App.1977); Cain v. Cain, 536 S.W.2d 866 (Mo.App.1976). Nonetheless, we have gratuitously reviewed the record for plain error per Rule 84......
-
Cain v. State Bd. of Podiatry
...State Podiatry Examining Board, 275 Ark. 100, 628 S.W.2d 295 (1982); Cain v. Hershewe, 760 S.W.2d 146 (Mo.App.1988); Cain v. Cain, 546 S.W.2d 203 (Mo.App.1977); Cain v. Cain, 536 S.W.2d 866 "[A]llegations of error not briefed or not properly briefed shall not be considered in any civil appe......
-
Karleskint v. Karleskint
...by substantial evidence and therefore must be reversed. See Bonadonna v. Bonadonna, 322 S.W.2d 925, 926 (Mo.1959); Cain v. Cain, 546 S.W.2d 203 (Mo.App.1977). The order quashing the writ of execution is reversed and the cause remanded for further CLEMENS and GUNN, JJ., concur. 1 The same ju......