Cain v. Scott

Decision Date27 December 1985
Citation782 F.2d 1050
PartiesCain v. Scott 85-2289
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

E.D.Ark.

DISMISSED **

** See Local Rule 12.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Cain v. Webster, 15585
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 27, 1989
    ...These rules are particularly applicable in view of the plaintiff's experience in litigation. Mullen v. Renner, supra. See Cain v. Scott, 782 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir.1985); Cain v. State of Arkansas and Arkansas State Podiatry Board, 734 F.2d 377 (8th Cir.1984); Cain v. Arkansas State Podiatry Ex......
  • Cain v. Buehner and Buehner
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • September 25, 1992
    ...260 (Mo.App.S.D., 1992); Cain v. Webster, 770 S.W.2d 327 (Mo.App.1989); Cain v. Hershewe, 760 S.W.2d 146 (Mo.App.1988); Cain v. Scott, 782 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir.1985); Cain v. State of Arkansas and Arkansas State Podiatry Board, 734 F.2d 377 (8th Cir.1984); Cain v. Arkansas State Podiatry Exam......
  • Cain v. State Bd. of Podiatry
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • August 4, 1992
    ...was "particularly applicable in view of plaintiff's experience in litigation." The court cited the following cases: Cain v. Scott, 782 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir.1985); Cain v. State of Arkansas and Arkansas State Podiatry Board, 734 F.2d 377 (8th Cir.1984); Cain v. Arkansas State Podiatry Examinin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT