Cairnes v. Pelton

Decision Date13 February 1906
Citation63 A. 105,103 Md. 40
PartiesCAIRNES v. PELTON.
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Allegany County; A. Hunter and Robert R Henderson, Judges.

Action by Adelaide L. Pelton against Annie Cairnes for slander. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before McSHERRY, C.J., and BRISCOE, PAGE, PEARCE, SCHMUCKER JONES, and BURKE, JJ.

A. A Doub, for appellant.

David J. Lewis, for appellee.

BURKE J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered against the appellant by the circuit court for Allegany county in the action for slander instituted against her by the appellee, Adelaide L Pelton. There are four exceptions contained in the record. Three of these are concerned with the rulings of the court upon questions of evidence, and the fourth relates to the disposition made by the court of the prayers of the respective parties offered at the conclusion of the case.

It appears from the record that the appellee, Mrs. Pelton, who is the mother of a number of children, was the widow of John Pelton, who died in 1901; that both the appellant and appellee were residents of the city of Cumberland, Md. The home of Mrs. Cairnes was on the corner of Rebecca and Union streets, and that of Mrs. Pelton was located opposite to that of Mrs. Cairnes on Rebecca street, both houses fronting on Union street. The alleged words which constitute the cause of action are set forth in the declaration as follows: "That on or about the 15th day of September, 1902, the said Annie Cairnes, in conversation with Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster and other persons, who were then residing in the city of Cumberland, wickedly contriving to injure and defame the good name and character and reputation for chastity of the said Adelaide L. Pelton (who had always been a good, pure, faithful, chaste, and affectionate wife to her said husband, and who had always been a pure and chaste woman, of good character and reputation for chastity as aforesaid), and to cause it to be believed by the said Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster and other people of the city of Cumberland, Allegany county, and vicinity, that the said Adelaide L. Pelton was, during her said marriage, unchaste and had been guilty of adultery, falsely and maliciously spoke of and touching the character and reputation for chastity of the said Adelaide L. Pelton words as follows, viz. 'You are moving here, and don't know the people' (meaning thereby that Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster was moving into the vicinity where Mrs. Pelton lived and was not acquainted with the people residing therein). 'I am going to warn you who not to associate with, who are not fit people. These people across the way' (meaning thereby that she, the said Annie Cairnes, was about to warn the said Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster, and to name to her what people in the vicinity were fit and proper persons for her, the said Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster, to associate with, and meaning thereby to designate the said Adelaide L. Pelton as a person not fit for her, the said Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster, to associate with); and upon inquiry by the said Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster as to what was the matter with them, the said Mrs. Annie Cairnes, wickedly contriving to injure and defame the good name and chaste character and the character and reputation for chastity of the said Adelaide L. Pelton, and to cause it to be believed by the said Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster and the other people of Allegany county that the said Adelaide L. Pelton was, during her marriage to the said John Pelton and during the time she was his wife and had lived with him as such, unchaste and had been guilty of adultery, and was a woman of bad character and reputation for chastity, falsely and maliciously spoke of and touching the character and reputation for chastity of the said Adelaide L. Pelton to the said Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster and others the false, scandalous, and malicious words as follows: 'Mrs. Pelton's youngest child was born of another man. Her husband was paralyzed for years, and it would have been impossible for him to have been the father of it. Yes, it is true, and everybody knows it' (meaning thereby that the youngest child of the said Adelaide L. Pelton was not the child of John Pelton, the husband of the said Adelaide L. Pelton, but was the child of another man in the town of Cumberland, and that Mrs. Pelton was an unfaithful wife and unchaste woman, and meaning thereby to charge that the said Adelaide L. Pelton was a woman of bad character for chastity and guilty of adultery during her marriage with her husband, the said John Pelton, and while she lived with him as his wife, and that the said Adelaide L. Pelton had carnal intercourse with men other than her husband during her marriage to her husband, the said John Pelton, and while she was living with him as his wife, and that the people of the vicinity in which she lived and the people of the city of Cumberland and of Allegany county knew that her reputation for chastity was bad, and she was a lewd and unchaste woman, and of lewd conduct and behavior during her marriage to the said John Pelton, her husband as aforesaid)." The defendant filed a demand for a bill of particulars. In response to this demand the plaintiff filed a bill of particulars, in which she stated "that the defendant, in Cumberland, Md., on the 15th day of September, 1902, or about that day in September, 1902, maliciously stated in the presence of Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster that the plaintiff's youngest child was born of another man, her husband was paralyzed for years, and it would have been impossible for him to have been the father of it. 'Yes; it is true, and everybody knows it.' Which statement the plaintiff says was false and malicious, and constituted a willful slander upon the character and good name of the plaintiff, and has greatly damaged her, for which she claims $5,000 damages." The defendant then entered the general issue plea. This was the only plea interposed by her to the action, and the case was tried upon the issue joined upon this plea.

The plaintiff offered evidence by Mrs. Ruth H. Dempster to prove that Mrs. Cairnes had published of and concerning the plaintiff the defamatory words set out in the declaration and in the plaintiff's bill of particulars. The plaintiff then called Miss Louise Plato, and proposed to offer testimony by her tending to prove that she was present with Mrs. Dempster and Mrs. Cairnes on the occasion testified to by Mrs. Dempster, and that Mrs. Cairnes on that occasion had said in her presence and in that of Mrs. Dempster: "You are moving here and don't know the people. I am going to warn you who not to associate with, who are not fit people. These people across the way--Mrs. Pelton's youngest child was born of another man. Her husband was paralyzed for years and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT