California Democratic Party v Jones

Decision Date26 June 2000
Docket Number99401
Citation147 L.Ed.2d 502,120 S.Ct. 2402,530 U.S. 567
Parties CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY et al., PETITIONERS v. BILL JONES, SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
296 cases
  • Green Party of Ct v. Garfield
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • March 20, 2008
    ... ... It has enshrined the Republican and Democratic Parties in a permanently preferred position, and has established requirements for funding ... 230, 126 S.Ct. 2479, 165 L.Ed.2d 482 (2006); see also California Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567, 585-86, 120 S.Ct. 2402, 147 L.Ed.2d 502 (2000) ... ...
  • Correll v. Herring
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • July 11, 2016
    ... ... his individual right to "vote for a presidential nominee at a party's nominating convention," "by stripping delegates" to the 2016 Republican ... Democratic Nat'l Party , 836 F.2d 837, 84142 (4th Cir.1987). B. Ripeness "A claim is ... , 169 L.Ed.2d 665 (2008) (internal citations omitted); see also California Democratic Party v. Jones , 530 U.S. 567, 575, 120 S.Ct. 2402, 147 ... ...
  • Fitzgerald v. Alcorn
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
    • January 19, 2018
    ... ... For example, a party may use a primary election in which all registered voters are invited to ... Democratic Party v. Jones , 530 U.S. 567, 575, 120 S.Ct. 2402, 147 L.Ed.2d 502 ... Central Committee , the Supreme Court examined a series of California laws that regulated the internal governance of the State's political ... ...
  • De La Fuente v. Simon, A19-1994
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • March 18, 2020
    ... ... P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for amicus curiae Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party. OPINION PER CURIAM. The Chair of The Republican Party ... De La Fuente, a California resident, announced on May 16, 2019, that he would seek the national ... See Cal. Democratic Party v. Jones , 530 U.S. 567, 575, 120 S.Ct. 2402, 147 L.Ed.2d 502 (2000) (noting a ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 books & journal articles
  • The Independent State Legislature Doctrine, Federal Elections, and State Constitutions
    • United States
    • University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Law Review (FC Access) No. 55-1, 2020
    • Invalid date
    ...original) (quoting McPherson, 146 U.S. at 25).502. Id. at 124.503. McPherson, 146 U.S. at 25. 504. Id.505. Id.506. Id.507. Id.508. Id.509. 530 U.S. 567, 590 (2000) (Stevens, J., dissenting).510. Id. at 603. 511. Id. His dissent did not mention McPherson or any other U.S. Supreme Court cases......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Suplemmentary Materials
    • January 1, 2007
    ...626 (1998), 603 California v. Thompson, 313 U.S. 109, 61 S.Ct. 930, 85 L.Ed. 1219 (1941), 867 California Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567, 120 S.Ct. 2402, 147 L.Ed.2d 502 (2000), 1515, 1533 California Div. of Labor Standards Enforce. v. Dillingham Constr. N.A. , Inc., 519 U.S. 316, 1......
  • Judicial activism: an empirical examination of voting behavior on the Rehnquist natural court.
    • United States
    • Constitutional Commentary Vol. 24 No. 1, March 2007
    • March 22, 2007
    ...57 privacy liberal Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council 530 U.S. 363 federalism liberal California Democ- first ratic Party v. Jones 530 U.S. 567 amendment liberal Cook v. Gralike 531 U.S. 510 civil rights liberal Lorillard Tobacco first Co. v. Reilly 533 U.S. 525 amendment liberal Brow......
  • Rucho v. Common Cause—a Critique
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 70-5, 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...380 (1932).230. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 232 (1962).231. Wesberry, 376 U.S. at 6-7.232. See, e.g., Cal. Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567, 572-73 (2000) ("States have a major role to play in structuring . . . the election process . . . they must act within limits imposed by the Co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 provisions
  • Chapter 103, HB 193; Chapter 103 – MODIFIED BLANKET PRIMARY ELECTION
    • United States
    • Alaska Session Laws
    • January 1, 2001
    ...The purpose of this Act is to (1) comply with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in California Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567 (2000), which required state law to recognize a political party's right to determine with whom they will associate under the First Amendment to......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT