California Fig Syrup Co. v. Putnam, 131.
Decision Date | 26 July 1895 |
Docket Number | 131. |
Parties | CALIFORNIA FIG SYRUP CO. v. PUTNAM et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit |
Fish, Richardson & Storrow, Frederick P. Fish, and James J. Storrow, Jr., for appellees.
Before PUTNAM, Circuit Judge, and NELSON and ALDRICH, District Judges.
We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions of the circuit court in this cause, but we do not wish to be understood to approve all the cases cited in its opinion. It is sufficient to refer to Medicine Co. v. Wood, 108 U.S. 218, 2 Sup.Ct. 436, and to the underlying principles of Church v. Proctor, 13 C.C.A. 426, 66 F. 240, decided by this court February 2, 1895, as supporting the line of reasoning found in that opinion. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Beauchamp v. Bertig
...a view to obtaining an unconscionable advantage. 91 U.S. 643; 135 U.S. 457; 165 U.S. 386; 91 U.S. 206; 108 U.S. 218; 70 F. 376; 85 F. 231; 69 F. 740; 98 F. 872. When a court of a sister has assumed jurisdiction over the person, it must be presumed that it had rightfully done so. 22 Ark. 389......
-
Nelson v. J.H. Winchell & Co., Inc.
... ... part, relief will be denied to him. California Fig Syrup ... Co. v. Putnam, 69 F. 740, 16 C. C. A. 376, and (C. C.) ... ...
-
Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.
... ... exhibit in this litigation ... The ... learned Judge Putnam, in the Circuit Court, under the view ... expressed in his opinion, that ... High ... on Injunctions, Secs. 1092-1095; California Fig Syrup ... Company v. Putnam (C.C.) 66 F. 750; Id., 69 F. 740, 16 ... ...
-
California Fig-Syrup Co. v. Frederick Stearns & Co.
...to the public, and a fraud upon it. The case was carried to the court of appeals and affirmed upon the opinion of the circuit judge. 16 C.C.A. 376, 69 F. 740. is had by the defendant upon a decision of the court of appeals of the Ninth circuit, which was on an appeal from an order of Judge ......