California v. Hudson

Docket NumberD068439
Decision Date16 August 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
24 cases
  • People v. Holm
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 2016
    ...to the education of students.” ( In re J.L., supra , 242 Cal.App.4th at p. 1114, 195 Cal.Rptr.3d 482.)In People v. Hudson (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 575, 580, 206 Cal.Rptr.3d 336, the court applied the same definition of “commercial establishment” and held a commercial bank is such an establishme......
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • November 30, 2016
    ...intent to commit larceny, and (4) the value of the property that is taken or intended to be taken does not exceed $950. (People v. Hudson (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 575, 580; People v. Stylz, supra, 2 Cal.App.5th at p. 534; People v. Contreras (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 868, 892.) "Any other entry in......
  • People v. Thomas
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • February 8, 2017
    ...establishment]; People v. Holm (2016) 3 Cal.App.5th 141, 147 [golf and country club is commercial establishment]; People v. Hudson (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 575, 581-582, review granted October 26, 2016, S237340 [bank is commercial establishment]; People v. Abarca (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 475, 481-4......
  • People v. Pridemore
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 2016
    ...show he was convicted of a qualifying offense, including the value of the property involved if necessary for relief. (People v. Hudson (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 575, 583-584; People v. Johnson (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 953, 969-970; People v. Hall (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th1255, 1263; People v. Perkins (......
  • Get Started for Free