California v. Jo

Docket NumberC079280
Decision Date03 October 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
70 cases
  • Granados v. Montgomery
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • July 22, 2019
    ...nor a unanimity instruction is required when the crime falls under the "continuous conduct" exception.'[Citations.]" (People v. Jo (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 1128, 1178.)Under the "continuous conduct" rule, a unanimity instruction is not required when "the acts are so closely connected as to for......
  • People v. White
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 2019
    ...instruction. A jury verdict in a criminal case must be unanimous. (People v. Covarrubias (2016) 1 Cal.5th 838, 877; People v. Jo (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 1128, 1178.) This means that " 'the jury must agree unanimously the defendant is guilty of a specific crime.' [Citation.] Thus, 'if one crim......
  • People v. Valdez
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • February 24, 2022
  • People v. Dias
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • December 21, 2018
    ...essential issue " 'may be cured if the essential material is covered by other correct instructions properly given.' " (People v. Jo (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 1128, 1173-1174.) Here, the court was not required to modify the pattern instruction. Dias's first request was that the jurors be instruc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 2 - §11. Expert opinion
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Chapter 2 Foundation
    • Invalid date
    ...questions were tantamount to opining on mental state of D required for certain sex crime offenses); People v. Jo (3d Dist.2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 1128, 1177 (expert's overview of statute without opinion about its application to case did not undermine jury's fact-finding role). Thus, a court mu......
  • Submission to jury and deliberations
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Objections
    • March 29, 2023
    ...an affirmative defense which is inconsistent with the defense theory of the case over the defendant’s objection. People v. Jo (2017) 15 Cal. App. 5th 1128, 1163, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 82. A court must give an instruction requested by a party if the instruction correctly states the law and relat......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Objections
    • March 29, 2023
    ...373, 247 Cal. Rptr. 3d 221, §21:110 Jimenez, People v. (2008) 165 Cal. App. 4th 75, 80 Cal. Rptr. 579, §12:80 Jo, People v. (2017) 15 Cal. App. 5th 1128, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 82, §22:10 Joehnk, People v. (1995) 35 Cal. App. 4th 1488, 42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 6, §17:140 John Norton Farms, Inc. v. Todag......
  • Table of Cases null
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...Dist. 2008)—Ch. 2, §3.1.2 People v. Jimenez, 21 Cal. 3d 595, 147 Cal. Rptr. 172, 580 P.2d 672 (1978)—Ch. 5-B, §2.2.2(2) People v. Jo, 15 Cal. App. 5th 1128, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 82 (3d Dist. 2017)—Ch. 2, §11.2.1 People v. Joehnk, 35 Cal. App. 4th 1488, 42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 6 (4th Dist. 1995)—Ch. 1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT