California v. Lucero
| Docket Number | C077666 |
| Decision Date | 25 October 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
31 cases
-
Almond Alliance of Cal. v. Fish & Game Comm'n
...or redundant, or would otherwise make the item markedly dissimilar to the other items in the list." ’ " ’ " ( People v. Lucero (2019) 41 Cal.App.5th 370, 398, 254 Cal.Rptr.3d 233.)If we were to apply the noscitur a sociis canon to the term invertebrate in section 45 to limit and restrict th......
-
People v. Kelly
...of the judgment is not warranted simply because the circumstances might also reasonably be reconciled with a contrary finding.”' ” (Lucero, at p. 411, quoting People Kaufman (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 370, 381.) “It is well settled that ‘ “[a] reversal for insufficient evidence ‘is unwarranted u......
-
People v. Rodriguez
...fine and included in the order of the court." We apply the plain language when interpreting this statute. ( People v. Lucero (2019) 41 Cal.App.5th 370, 394-395, 254 Cal.Rptr.3d 233, quoting People v. Arias (2008) 45 Cal.4th 169, 177, 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 195 P.3d 103 ["The statute's plain mean......
-
People v. Way
...the testimony of a single witness that satisfies the standard is sufficient to uphold the finding.' " (People v. Lucero (2019) 41 Cal.App.5th 370, 411 (Lucero), quoting People v. Barnwell (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1038, 1052 (Barnwell), italics added.) At trial, J.H. identified Way as one of the in......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Additional charges
...apply even though the elements of the general statute are not mirrored on the face of the special statute. See, People v. Lucero (2019) 41 Cal.App.5th 370. §2:85.3 Lying to Officer About Not Drinking (VC §31) In People v. Morera-Munoz (2016) 5 Cal.App.5th 838, defendant was found asleep in ......
-
Table of Cases null
...§3.2 People v. Lucatero, 166 Cal. App. 4th 1110, 83 Cal. Rptr. 3d 364 (5th Dist. 2008)—Ch. 5-A, §3.3.1(2)(a)[2] People v. Lucero, 41 Cal. App. 5th 370, 254 Cal. Rptr. 3d 233 (3d Dist. 2019)—Ch. 1, §4.1 People v. Lugashi, 205 Cal. App. 3d 632, 252 Cal. Rptr. 434 (2d Dist. 1988)—Ch. 3-B, §20.......
-
Chapter 1 - §4. Relevance of specific evidence
...cocaine) or because it helps explain, or connects the defendant with, the commission of the crime. See People v. Lucero (3d Dist.2019) 41 Cal.App.5th 370, 400, n.11 (defining real evidence); e.g., People v. Wilson (1st Dist.1965) 238 Cal.App.2d 447, 461-63 (burglary tools found on D were re......
-
Table of cases
...§3:58.1 People v. Lucas (1978) 82 Cal.App.3d 47, §8:14.1 People v. Lucero (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 1011, §9:120 People v. Lucero (2019) 41 Cal.App.5th 370, §2:85.2 People v. Luckett (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1214, §§3:58, 3:59.2 People v. Lugashi (1988) 205 Cal.App.3d 632, §§9:36.3, 9:105.9 People......