Calkin and Samuel Jones, Trading Under the Firm and Style of Calkin and Company, Plaintiffs In Error v. James Cocke
Decision Date | 01 December 1852 |
Citation | 14 L.Ed. 398,14 How. 227,55 U.S. 227 |
Parties | E. P. CALKIN AND SAMUEL JONES, TRADING UNDER THE FIRM AND STYLE OF E. P. CALKIN AND COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JAMES H. COCKE |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial8 cases
-
Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi
...within [Hawaii] as elsewhere within the United States." Pub.L. No. 86-3, § 15, 73 Stat. 11 (1959). See also Calkin v. Cocke, 55 U.S. 227, 235-36, 14 How. 227, 14 L.Ed. 398 (1852); Benner v. Porter, 50 U.S. 235, 243, 9 How. 235, 13 L.Ed. 119 (1850). In other words, § 1981 has long applied in......
-
Higgins v. Brown
... ... of power by the Congress under article 4, § 3, of the ... Constitution of the ... error could have been sued out or appeals could have ... 11th day of July, 1889, having killed one James H ... Burnes, and under the state government, ... provision. See, also, Calkin" v. Cocke, 14 How. 237, 14 L.Ed ... \xC2" ... case of American & Ocean Insurance Company v. 356 Bales of ... Cotton, 1 Pet. (U. S.) 511, ... In the ... case of Jones v. United States, 137 U.S. 202, 11 ... S.Ct ... ...
-
Higgins v. Brown
...when Congress admitted the said state under said Constitution it thereby expressly concurred in such provision. See, also, Calkin v. Cocke, 14 How. 227, 14 L. Ed. 398. ¶106 It is obvious that it has been the universal practice in this republic to prosecute pending criminal cases, not of a f......
-
State v. Balli
...by the United States, on behalf of Texas, since which time Texas has exercised jurisdiction over it. Paschal's Dig., art. 438; Calkin v. Cocke, 14 How. 227 ; Lee v. King, 21 Tex. [577], 582; Trevino v. Fernandez, 13 Tex. [630], 663; Martin v. Weyman, 26 Tex. [460], "By the `Articles of Anne......
Request a trial to view additional results