Callahan v. State
Decision Date | 30 April 1999 |
Citation | 767 So.2d 380 |
Parties | James Harvey CALLAHAN v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Randall Scott Susskind, Montgomery, for appellant.
Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and J. Clayton Crenshaw, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
On June 26, 1982, James Harvey Callahan was convicted for intentionally murdering Rebecca Suzanne Howell during the course of a first-degree kidnapping, a capital offense under § 13A-5-40(a)(1), Ala.Code 1975. On July 8, 1982, after the jury recommended that Callahan be sentenced to death by a 10-2 vote, the trial court sentenced Callahan to death. This court affirmed Callahan's conviction and sentence. Callahan v. State, 471 So.2d 447 (Ala.Cr.App.1983). The Alabama Supreme Court reversed the conviction and remanded the cause for a new trial. Ex parte Callahan, 471 So.2d 463 (Ala.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019, 106 S.Ct. 567, 88 L.Ed.2d 552 (1985). On November 7, 1987, Callahan was again convicted of capital murder, and the jury returned an unanimous recommendation for the death penalty. On November 25, 1987, the trial court sentenced Callahan to death. This court affirmed Callahan's second conviction and sentence. Callahan v. State, 557 So.2d 1292 (Ala.Cr.App.1989). The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and death sentence on November 17, 1989. Ex parte Callahan, 557 So.2d 1311 (Ala.1989). The United States Supreme Court denied Callahan's petition for certiorari review on October 1, 1990. Callahan v. Alabama, 498 U.S. 881, 111 S.Ct. 216, 112 L.Ed.2d 176 (1990).
On September 30, 1992, Callahan, through counsel, filed a Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim.P., petition for post-conviction relief, which he amended on March 14, 1996, and again amended on July 2, 1996. On July 1-2, 1996, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the claims of relief sought by Callahan. Judge Samuel H. Monk, the circuit judge who presided over Callahan's first and second trials, also presided over the evidentiary hearing on the Rule 32 petition. On February 17, 1998, the trial court entered an order denying Callahan's Rule 32 petition. Callahan now appeals the trial court's decision. We affirm.
The State's evidence at the 1987 trial tended to prove that Rebecca Suzanne Howell, a 26-year-old college student at Jacksonville State University, was abducted from the Norge Village Washeteria in Calhoun County, some time between 12:30 a.m. and 1:30 a.m. on the morning of February 4, 1982. Her body was found about two weeks later floating in Tallasseehatchee Creek near Broughton Bridge, where it had become entangled in some brush. An autopsy revealed that Ms. Howell had been killed by asphyxiation, consistent with smothering. Her hands had been bound with strips of white plastic duct tape, and she had apparently been raped. She was wearing blue jeans but no underpants, shoes, or socks. Callahan's truck was seen at another nearby washeteria shortly before Ms. Howell was abducted; the individual driving the truck was seen watching, approaching, and then following another lone female. A truck generally matching the description of Callahan's truck was also seen at the Norge Village Washeteria at or near the time of Ms. Howell's abduction.1 Initially, we note that on direct appeal all issues were scrutinized, including those issues reviewable only under the "plain error" doctrine. Rule 45A, Ala. R.App.P. There is no plain error review in an appeal from the denial of a Rule 32 petition. Thompson v. State, 615 So.2d 129, 130-31 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 615 So.2d 129 , cert. denied, 510 U.S. 976, 114 S.Ct. 467, 126 L.Ed.2d 418 (1993).
Callahan presents numerous claims regarding the performance of his trial counsel and appellate counsel. He contends that, as a result of the errors committed by both his trial counsel and appellate counsel, he was denied the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Bui v. State, 717 So.2d 6, 12-13 (Ala.Cr. App.1997).
Moreover, "`[a] finding of no plain error is one factor to consider when assessing the performance of ... counsel.'" Fortenberry v. State, 659 So.2d 194, 200 (Ala.Cr.App.1994), quoting Hallford v. State, 629 So.2d 6, 10 (Ala.Cr.App.1992).
Callahan initially raises the following issues regarding ineffective assistance of trial counsel during the guilt phase of his trial.
Callahan alleges that he was denied effective assistance of counsel be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Centobie v. State
...that the appellant suffered no prejudice as a result of the State's use of the trial aid. Rule 45, Ala.R.App.P.; see Callahan v. State, 767 So.2d 380 (Ala. Crim.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Crim.App.1999); Smith v. State, supra (it is presumed that jurors followed the instru......
-
George v. State
...the trial court the opportunity to closely examine the complete testimony." Hamm, 913 So.2d at 478-79 (quoting Callahan v. State, 767 So.2d 380, 403 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999) ).Here, the record indicates that George moved the circuit court on July 28, 2010 –- approximately 14 months after Calv......
-
Brown v. State
...assistance." Hallford, 629 So.2d at 9. See also, e.g., Cartwright v. State, 645 So.2d 326 (Ala.Cr.App. 1994).'" Callahan v. State, 767 So.2d 380, 384 (Ala. Cr.App.1999), quoting Bui v. State, 717 So.2d 6, 12-13 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a death-penalty ca......
-
Hall v. State
...1983); Carpenter v. State, 404 So.2d 89, 97 (Ala.Cr.App.1980), cert. denied, 404 So.2d 100 (Ala.1981).'" Callahan v. State, 767 So.2d 380, 392 (Ala. Cr.App.1999). For an argument by counsel to amount to reversible error it must "have so infected the trial with unfairness, taken in the conte......