Calloway v. Nifong
| Decision Date | 31 May 1822 |
| Citation | Calloway v. Nifong, 1 Mo. 223 (Mo. 1822) |
| Parties | CALLOWAY v. NIFONG |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
In this case, Nifong received judgment in the Madison Circuit Court, in an action of debt against Calloway and John McCabe; to reverse which judgment, Calloway brought his writ of error, and assigned error in fact, that his co-defendant died before judgment, to which, the defendant in error, pleads “ in nullo est erratum;” and the only question for the consideration of this Court, is, whether the error complained of, is one which this Court can correct? According to the established course of the common law, error in fact, can only be corrected in the Court where it accrued, or in which the record is: . In this case, the remedy must be by writ of error, coram nobis, in the Circuit Court, the record being in that Court.(a) The writ of error must be...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Ex Parte Martinez
...(Fellows v. Griffin, 9 Smedes & M. 362; Keller v. Scott, 2 Smedes & M. 82; Land v. Williams, 12 Smedes & M. 362 ); in Missouri (Calloway v. Nifong, 1 Mo. 223; Ex parte Toney, 11 Mo. 661; Powell v. Gott, 13 Mo. 458 [53 Am. Dec. 153]); in New York (Higbie v. Comstock, 1 Denio, 652; Maher v. C......
-
Cross v. Gould
...v. Sack, 81 Mo. 610-616; Adler v. State, 35 Ark. 517-530, 37 Am. Rep. 48; Craig v. Smith, 65 Mo. 536; Ex parte Toney, 11 Mo. 661; Calloway v. Nifong, 1 Mo. 223; State ex rel. Hudson v. Heinrich, 14 Mo. App. 146; Ex parte Gray, 77 Mo. 160; Ex parte Page, 49 Mo. 291; Powell v. Gott, 13 Mo. 45......
-
Reed v. Bright
... ... v. Riley, 219 Mo. 667; 11 Ency. Pl ... and Prac. 847; 23 Cyc. 883; Cross v. Gould, 131 ... Mo.App. 685; Heard v. Sack, 81 Mo. 610; Calloway ... v. Nifung, 1 Mo. 223; Dugan v. Scott, 37 ... Mo.App. 663; Latshaw v. McNees, 50 Mo. 381; ... Walker v. Deaver, 79 Mo. 664. There is no ... ...
-
Cross v. Gould
... ... 610, ... [110 S.W. 677] ... Adler v. State, 35 Ark. 517, 530; Craig v ... Smith, 65 Mo. 536; Ex parte Toney, 11 Mo. 661; ... Calloway v. Nifung, 1 Mo. 159; State ex rel ... Hudson v. Heinrich, 14 Mo.App. 146; Ex parte Gray, 77 ... Mo. 160; Ex parte Page, 49 Mo. 291; Powell v ... of fact not appearing on the record of the court which ... renders the judgment invalid. [ Calloway v. Nifong, 1 ... Mo. 223; see also Dugan v. Scott, 37 Mo.App. 663.] ... Where a ... married woman defendant was sued without her ... ...