Calvert v. Beck, 6 Div. 761.

Decision Date16 January 1941
Docket Number6 Div. 761.
Citation240 Ala. 442,199 So. 846
PartiesCALVERT v. BECK.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Probate Court, Blount County; J. R. Copeland, Judge.

Petitions of J. B. Calvert for letters of administration upon the estate of Albie Ann Calvert and for revocation of letters issued to Herman Beck, as administrator, and motion of the administrator to strike said petition. From an order or decree granting the motion to strike, petitioner Calvert appeals.

Reversed rendered, and remanded with instructions.

J. T Johnson, of Oneonta, for appellant.

P. A Nash, of Oneonta, for appellee.

LIVINGSTON Justice.

The sole question presented for review by this record is, the priority of the right to administer the estate of Albie Ann Calvert, who died on September 6, 1940, a resident of Blount County, Alabama.

On September 18, 1940, Herman Beck, the appellee, and who is the husband of a niece of Albie Ann Calvert, deceased, filed his petition in the Probate Court of Blount County asking for a grant of letters of administration on the estate of said decedent. On the same day letters were issued in accordance with the prayer of the petition.

On September 27, 1940, J. B. Calvert, the appellant, and a brother of the whole blood of Albie Ann Calvert, filed two petitions in the Probate Court of Blount County; one praying for a grant of letters of administration to himself on the estate of Albie Ann Calvert, deceased, and the other praying for a revocation of letters previously issued to Herman Beck, and for a grant of such letters to himself. Herman Beck filed a motion to strike the petition last above mentioned. The motion and the petition to which it was addressed were heard on October 17, 1940, and resulted in a judgment granting the motion of appellee, Beck. Calvert appeals.

It will be observed that the petitions of both Beck and Calvert, praying for letters of administration on the estate of Albie Ann Calvert, deceased, were filed within forty days from the death of the intestate, as was also the petition of Calvert praying for a revocation of the letters theretofore granted to Beck.

In respect to enforcing the preferential right to administer, as declared by section 5742, Code, as amended by Acts of 1936, Extra Session, page 29, the Probate Court has no discretion. It may not weigh the relative qualifications of two applicants and choose between them when one has a statutory preference. The right is not lost because one not in the same preferred class may be found by the court to be better qualified, unless the one who is preferred is disqualified under section 5730, Code. Johnson v. Pierson, 229 Ala. 85, 155 So. 695; Marcus v. McKee, 227 Ala. 577, 151 So. 456; Kidd v. Bates, 120 Ala. 79, 23 So. 735, 41 L.R.A. 154, 74 Am.St.Rep. 17; Crommelin v. Raoull, 169 Ala. 413, 53 So. 745; Nichols v. Smith, 186 Ala. 587, 65 So. 30; Bell v. Fulgham, 202 Ala. 217, 80 So. 39.

The degree of kindred must be computed in Alabama according to the rules of the civil law. Section 7368, Code of 1923. In such computation, the rule is to begin with the intestate and ascend from him or her to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Smith v. Rice
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 6, 1956
    ...Griffin v. Irwin, 246 Ala. 631, 633, 21 So.2d 668, 158 A.L.R. 288; Moore v. Strickland, 246 Ala. 624, 625, 21 So.2d 665; Calvert v. Beck, 240 Ala. 442, 443, 199 So. 846; Johnston v. Pierson, 229 Ala. 85, 87, 155 So. 695; Bell v. Fulgham, 202 Ala. 217, 218, 80 So. 39; Nichols v. Smith, 186 A......
  • Reagh v. Kelley
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 1970
    ...or number of removes, which separates two persons who are related by consanguinity. (Black's Law Dictionary (4th Ed.); Calvert v. Beck, 240 Ala. 442, 199 So. 846, 847; See Prob.Code, §§ 252, 253.) Accordingly, the term 'relatives * * * to the third degree' has reference to an ascertainable ......
  • Ogle v. Gordon
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 12, 1997
    ...193 (1948); Loeb v. Callaway, 250 Ala. 524, 35 So.2d 198 (1948); Griffin v. Irwin, 246 Ala. 631, 21 So.2d 668 (1945); Calvert v. Beck, 240 Ala. 442, 199 So. 846 (1941); Bivin v. Millsap, 238 Ala. 136, 189 So. 770 (1939); Starlin v. Love, 237 Ala. 38, 185 So. 380 (1938); Johnston v. Pierson,......
  • Randall v. Bockhorst, 12769.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • January 5, 1956
    ...statutes. For cases holding the statutory scheme to be mandatory, see, e. g., Hunt v. Crocker, 246 Ky. 338, 55 S.W.2d 20; Calvert v. Beck, 240 Ala. 442, 199 So. 846; In re Webb's Estate, 90 Colo. 470, 10 P.2d 947; In re Taylor's Estate, 61 Nev. 68, 114 P.2d 1086, 135 A.L.R. 580. For cases h......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT