Cambridge Literary Props., Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.m.b.H. & CO. KG., 07–1371.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 555 U.S. 815,129 S.Ct. 58 (Mem),172 L.Ed.2d 25 |
| Docket Number | No. 07–1371.,07–1371. |
| Parties | CAMBRIDGE LITERARY PROPERTIES, LTD., petitioner, v. W. GOEBEL PORZELLANFABRIK G.m.b.H. & CO. KG., et al. |
| Decision Date | 06 October 2008 |
555 U.S. 815
129 S.Ct. 58 (Mem)
172 L.Ed.2d 25
CAMBRIDGE LITERARY PROPERTIES, LTD., petitioner
v.
W. GOEBEL PORZELLANFABRIK G.m.b.H. & CO. KG., et al.
No. 07–1371.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 6, 2008.
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc., Civil No. 08-cv-358-JL.
...Literary Props., Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.m.b.H. & Co. KG., 510 F.3d 77, 102 (1st Cir.2007), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 58, 172 L.Ed.2d 25 (2008); see also Wyeth, 129 S.Ct. at 1193 (characterizing a manufacturer's argument that federal drug law pre-empted the plaintiff......
-
Riley v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (In re Duplication Mgmt., Inc.), Bankruptcy No. 10–17015–JNF.
...Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.m.b.H. & Co. Kg., 448 F.Supp.2d 244, 263 (D.Mass.2006), aff'd,510 F.3d 77 (1st Cir.2007), cert. denied,555 U.S. 815, 129 S.Ct. 58, 172 L.Ed.2d 25 (2008). Accordingly, she is entitled to recover Mortgage payments commencing with the December 2004 payment. ......
-
A.Y. v. Janssen Pharm. Inc., 3058 EDA 2016
...Cambridge Literary Props., Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.m.b.H. & Co. KG. , 510 F.3d 77, 102 (1st Cir. 2007), cert. denied , 555 U.S. 815, 129 S.Ct. 58, 172 L.Ed.2d 25 (2008) ; citing Wyeth v. Levine , 555 U.S. 555, 562, 129 S.Ct. 1187, 1193, 173 L.Ed.2d 51 (2009) (characterizing a ma......
-
Sacks v. Dissinger, SJC-13105
...Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.m.b.H. & Co. Kg., 448 F. Supp. 2d 244, 262-263 (D. Mass. 2006), aff'd, 510 F.3d 77 (1st Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 815, 129 S.Ct. 58, 172 L.Ed.2d 25 (2008) (unjust enrichment claim governed by three-year tort statute of limitations). Nonetheless, since the p......