Campbell Printing-Press & Mfg. Co. v. Manhattan El. Ry. Co.
| Decision Date | 07 November 1891 |
| Citation | 48 F. 344 |
| Parties | CAMPBELL PRINTING-PRESS & MANUF'G. CO. v. MANHATTAN EL. RY. CO. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Charles De Hart Brower and Philip R. Voorhies, for complainant.
Davies, Short & Townsend and Maynadier & Beach, for defendant.
The settled practice of this circuit is that, upon a bill and answer, application for judgment must be made, not at chambers, but at the equity term after the putting of the cause on the calendar. This may be done on short notice, after evidence of such damages has been taken as would warrant sending the cause to the commissioner. Motion denied, without prejudice.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Campbell Printing-Press & Mfg. Co. v. Manhattan Ry. Co.
...shown infringement of a valid patent owned by itself. Brickill v. Mayor, 7 Fed.Rep. 479. The decision of Judge BROWN in the case at bar (48 F. 344) did not pass upon this point. only settled a question of practice, holding that a motion at chambers was not proper procedure. The contention o......
- Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. Hoff